Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of the Muon Track Splitting (MTS) Validation in the new TkAl all-in-one tool #43708

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Jan 12, 2024

PR description:

This PR is a first attempt to integrate the Muon Track Splitting (a.k.a. MTS) tool in the new Tracker alignment all-in-one tool (introduced at #38304), as a follow-up to #43386 which removed the old (and unusable) configuration.
This PR builds on top of the previous internal PR at cms-trackeralign#31 and adds:

PR validation:

  • cmssw compiles
  • scam b runtests_MTSall runs fine.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, not to be backported.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 12, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43708/38398

  • This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43708/38400

  • This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Alignment/OfflineValidation (alca)

@cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @consuegs, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@adewit, @tlampen, @mmusich, @rsreds, @yuanchao, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 12, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cacdfb/36814/summary.html
COMMIT: 5f99680
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-01-12-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43708/36814/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cacdfb/36814/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cacdfb/36814/git-merge-result

Unit Tests

I found 7 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test SplitVall had ERRORS
---> test DMRall had ERRORS
---> test DiMuonVall had ERRORS
and more ...

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 15 lines from the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 405 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3247277
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3247252
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 40.564999999999976 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 1.266 KiB Tracking/ShortTrackResolution
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 0.426 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • Checked 200 log files, 161 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43708/38401

  • This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #43708 was updated. @cmsbuild, @perrotta, @saumyaphor4252, @consuegs can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 14, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cacdfb/36815/summary.html
COMMIT: 9b5497d
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-01-14-0000/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43708/36815/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Unit tests succeed

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1510f7f into cms-sw:master Jan 15, 2024
11 checks passed
@mmusich mmusich deleted the mm_dev_MTS_implementation_all_in_one_14_0_X branch January 15, 2024 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants