fix(avoidance): ignore objects less than execution threshold

[satoshi-ota]

Description

The avoidance module has the parameter lateral_execution_threshold, and it never throws RTC request for shift lines that are less than this threshold.

On the other hand, the module doesn't ignore object whose shift line is smaller than threshold and keeps stopping in front of it until the RTC request is approved. It is inconsistent and causes stuck.

In this PR, the module ignore objects whose shift length is less than avoidance_execution_lateral_threshold explicitly.

Tests performed

• PASS avoidance scenarios.
• PASS TIER IV internal scenairos.

Effects on system behavior

Nothing.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.05 ⚠️

Comparison is base (2cd0bcb) 15.53% compared to head (acea264) 15.49%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3595      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   15.53%   15.49%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        1333     1333              
  Lines       94707    94978     +271     
  Branches    30064    30254     +190     
==========================================
+ Hits        14711    14715       +4     
- Misses      63908    64168     +260     
- Partials    16088    16095       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	13.22% <0.00%> (?)
total	15.53% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 2cd0bcb

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
..._interface/include/qp_interface/osqp_interface.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...qp_interface/include/qp_interface/qp_interface.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
common/qp_interface/src/osqp_interface.cpp	30.81% <ø> (ø)
common/qp_interface/src/qp_interface.cpp	38.88% <ø> (ø)
common/qp_interface/test/test_osqp_interface.cpp	13.92% <ø> (ø)
...th_planner/scene_module/scene_module_interface.hpp	30.59% <ø> (ø)
...er/src/scene_module/avoidance/avoidance_module.cpp	3.64% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
...ehavior_path_planner/src/utils/avoidance/utils.cpp	3.55% <0.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
...lude/obstacle_cruise_planner/planner_interface.hpp	19.23% <ø> (ø)
planning/obstacle_cruise_planner/src/node.cpp	13.36% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️
... and 1 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.