Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate baseline error-prone checks to use jdk13 compatible qualifiers #1110

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 10, 2019

Conversation

carterkozak
Copy link
Contributor

Before this PR

The compiler failed on jdk13 when checks with suggested fixes were found.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Migrate baseline error-prone checks to use jdk13 compatible qualifiers
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

We don't run any tests on jdk13

@changelog-app
Copy link

changelog-app bot commented Dec 10, 2019

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

Migrate baseline error-prone checks to use jdk13 compatible qualifiers

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ private static void configureErrorProneOptions(
// Errorprone 2.3.4 isn't officially compatible with Java13 either
// https://github.com/google/error-prone/issues/1106
errorProneOptions.check("TypeParameterUnusedInFormals", CheckSeverity.OFF);
errorProneOptions.check("PreferCollectionConstructors", CheckSeverity.OFF);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

calling out that I re-enabled this because it uses the safe qualify method now.

@carterkozak
Copy link
Contributor Author

dozer?

@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot bot merged commit 690a9ec into develop Dec 10, 2019
@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot bot deleted the ckozak/jdk13_compatibility branch December 10, 2019 20:01
@svc-autorelease
Copy link
Collaborator

Released 2.42.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants