Add Run3 wfs (NanoV10)

[kskovpen]

PR description:

Addition of the new Run3 NanoV10 wfs for data (140.001, 140.002) and MC (offset .602). Also addresses https://its.cern.ch/jira/projects/PDMVRELVALS/issues/PDMVRELVALS-155 (for data). Comments are welcome.

@bbilin @jmartinb @rappoccio @kmaeshima @cms-sw/xpog-l2 @mmusich

PR validation:

Tested on the aforementioned wfs.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38733/31037

• This PR adds an extra 68KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Add Run3 ALCA Express/Prompt workflow #38681, Reorganize FastSim Run3 workflow #38660
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Clean up Phase-2 geometry (Up to D85) #38702, Reorganize FastSim Run3 workflow #38660, Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @kskovpen for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @trtomei, @beaucero, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[kskovpen]

test parameters:

• workflow = 11634.602
• pull_request = trivial V10 customize (12_4) #38667
• relvals_opt = -w upgrade

[kskovpen]

please test

[cmsbuild]

-1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cd7be7/26228/summary.html
COMMIT: 9e8924e
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-13-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38733/26228/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

This pull request cannot be automatically merged, could you please rebase it?
You can see the log for git cms-merge-topic here: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cd7be7/26228/git-merge-result

[srimanob]

Don't you need also to test new wf of 140.001, 140.002?

[kskovpen]

Don't you need also to test new wf of 140.001, 140.002?

I do, but first I wanted to test the ones in upgrade setup. If all can be run at once with bot, please let me know.

[kskovpen]

test parameters:

• workflow = 11634.602,140.001,140.002

[kskovpen]

please test

[srimanob]

You need to use

relvals_opt= -w standard,highstats,pileup,generator,extendedgen,production,cleanedupgrade,ged

[srimanob]

@cmsbuild please abort

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38733/31122

• This PR adds an extra 72KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_standard.py modified in PR(s): Don't recluster jets in HI miniAOD for Run 3  #38711, Add CPPF DQM modules  #38564
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Add Run3 ALCA Express/Prompt workflow #38681, Update BeamSpot in Run3 MC GTs + swap Run3RoundOptics25ns13TeVLowSigmaZ with Realistic25ns13p6TeVEarly2022Collision vtx smearing #38760, Ari changes #38758, Reorganize FastSim Run3 workflow #38660, Don't recluster jets in HI miniAOD for Run 3  #38711, Add CPPF DQM modules  #38564
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Update BeamSpot in Run3 MC GTs + swap Run3RoundOptics25ns13TeVLowSigmaZ with Realistic25ns13p6TeVEarly2022Collision vtx smearing #38760, Clean up Phase-2 geometry (Up to D85) #38702, Reorganize FastSim Run3 workflow #38660, Add miniAODDQM FastSim Validation #38736, Add CPPF DQM modules  #38564, Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #38733 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again.

[kskovpen]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cd7be7/26314/summary.html
COMMIT: cc0f57c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-18-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38733/26314/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-cd7be7/11634.602_TTbar_14TeV+2021_NanoV10+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano+ALCA
• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-cd7be7/140.001_RunMinimumBias2022+RunMinimumBias2022+HLTRUN3+RECONANORUN3+HARVESTRUN3
• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-cd7be7/140.002_RunZeroBias2022+RunZeroBias2022+HLTRUN3+RECONANORUN3+HARVESTRUN3

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3662417
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3662381
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1

[mariadalfonso]

@kskovpen
we need a backport for 12_4 as when we start the production of the nanoV10 we want to check that we have this wf unmodified

[kskovpen]

@mariadalfonso , 140.001 and 140.002 wfs were a bit adjusted in #38830. Once the PR is merged, we will make a back port to 12_4.