Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add time support to IPCutPFCandidateSelector #29596

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 5, 2020

Conversation

dntaylor
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This is a simple addition to the IPCutPFCandidateSelector to allow a filter on the delta time or time significance of particle flow candidates relative to the first primary vertex.

An example usage would be:

process.pfAllInTimeChargedHadrons = cms.EDFilter("IPCutPFCandidateSelector",
    d0Cut = cms.double(-1),
    d0SigCut = cms.double(-1),
    dtCut = cms.double(-1),
    dtSigCut = cms.double(3.0),
    dzCut = cms.double(-1),
    dzSigCut = cms.double(-1),
    src = cms.InputTag("pfAllChargedHadrons"),
    vertices = cms.InputTag("offlinePrimaryVertices4D")
)

This is a first part in adding timing to isolation sums.

PR validation:

Ran most of the following (before my kinit ran out, but its a simple change and the early ones succeeded):

runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos

Also ran on a phase-II sample with MTD timing available in particleFlow,
modifying the muon pfIsolation charged hadron inputs to be the in time charged hadrons
(rather than all charged hadrons) and correctly observe a reduction in PF isolation energy.
It is not yet decided if this will be used.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29596/14928

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29596/14935

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @dntaylor (Devin Taylor) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/ParticleFlow

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @ahinzmann, @riga, @cbernet, @jdolen, @gkasieczka, @hatakeyamak, @clelange this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 30, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5931/console Started: 2020/04/30 14:24

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: deef0a6
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ae5311/5931/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-30-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ae5311/5931/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2696239
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2695918
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented May 1, 2020

+1

  • Timing and timing error added as possible parameters to select on
  • Default settings do not use them
  • Jenkins tests pass

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

merge
@santocch please let me know if you have any objections

@santocch
Copy link

santocch commented May 7, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 7, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants