Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JS fixes #491

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2015
Merged

JS fixes #491

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2015

Conversation

XhmikosR
Copy link
Member

This is totally a WIP, but it works for me in both Firefox and Chome without any TypeErrors.

/CC @connor @connors @fat

Any suggestions are welcome.

PS. IE is broken after #446

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

I've uploaded all my PRs merged changes to http://xhmikosr.github.io/ for testing live with as many browsers as possible.

One thing with the current PR is that I believe we should also set the unprefixed properties. Also, the transition duration doesn't seem to work for Firefox.

Anyway, I'm waiting for feedback in my PRs and let me know if you notice any regressions.

@connors
Copy link
Collaborator

connors commented Mar 28, 2014

Nice. The only thing I still see that doesn't work in Firefox is the Push example.

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

@connors: that's because that patch is #518 ;)

@connors
Copy link
Collaborator

connors commented Apr 2, 2014

I'm seeing a couple of issues in Chrome and Firefox.

  1. The modal example no longer works.
  2. The push example has a lot of weirdness when the the user click the back button in the nav-bar.

I say we keep jamming on this for the next release.

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

XhmikosR commented Apr 2, 2014

This isn't ready... I say it in the OP. Plus I don't really like my approach, but until I have something better I'm keeping this open.

EDIT:

  1. the modal example works fine for me in Chrome and Firefox
  2. push works fine as long as you move your mouse over after clicking

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

@hnrch02: any thoughts on this? Seems everyone else isn't available and this patch is very important to ensure everything works on most browsers.

Only thing I don't like is duplicating getBrowserCapabilities but we don't seem to have a common file.

@hnrch02
Copy link
Contributor

hnrch02 commented Feb 1, 2015

Looks fine to me. Some way to share getBrowserCapabilities without duplicating it across files would be nice though, as you mentioned.

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

XhmikosR commented Feb 2, 2015

The reason I didn't make that separate is I don't know if the new file will be redundant or not...

Otherwise I'll merge this as it is.

@Johann-S
Copy link
Member

Johann-S commented Feb 2, 2015

I think it would be great to have a common.js file because they are few pull requests which need this like :
#675 or #427

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

XhmikosR commented Feb 3, 2015

How about we just merge this as it is and leave the refactoring for another PR? I'm not sure when I'll have some time to do it myself and it's a pity for Rachet to partially work.

@Johann-S
Copy link
Member

Johann-S commented Feb 3, 2015

Yes i think it would be easy to do it in a separate RP. I'll work on it

@hnrch02
Copy link
Contributor

hnrch02 commented Feb 3, 2015

@XhmikosR Fine by me.

XhmikosR added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2015
@XhmikosR XhmikosR merged commit 1fcd663 into master Feb 4, 2015
@XhmikosR XhmikosR deleted the js-fixes branch February 4, 2015 07:46
@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

XhmikosR commented Feb 4, 2015

@Johann-S: please CC me if you make a PR to refactor stuff.

@Johann-S
Copy link
Member

Johann-S commented Feb 4, 2015

@XhmikosR yes i want to do that, but i created a PR yesterday (#743) and my PR was closed because a common.js file already existed on this PR : #675

So, i'm not sure if i have to to wait for the merge of this PR (#675) or if i can begin (or continue) my refactoring PR

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member Author

XhmikosR commented Feb 4, 2015

Personally I believe the refactoring should come first and the other PR
should be rebased after that.
On Feb 4, 2015 10:12 AM, "Johann" notifications@github.com wrote:

@XhmikosR https://github.com/XhmikosR yes i want to do that, but i
created a PR yesterday (#743 #743)
and my PR was closed because a common.js file already existed on this PR :
#675 #675

So, i'm not sure if it's better to wait for the merge of this PR (#675
#675) or if i can begin my
refactoring PR


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#491 (comment).

@Johann-S Johann-S mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants