Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Add API endpoints for managing tracer sessions and filter views #101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Oct 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new API endpoints for managing tracer sessions, including creation, updates, deletions, and retrieval of session metrics.
    • Added functionality for saving and applying custom filter views for tracer session data.
    • Enhanced organization management with new capabilities to create, update, and manage members and roles.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce several new API endpoints for managing tracer sessions, which are essential for tracking the performance of language models. Key additions include methods for creating, updating, deleting, and retrieving tracer sessions and their associated metrics. Additionally, new endpoints for managing filter views and organizations have been implemented, enhancing the overall functionality of the API.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml - Added methods for creating, updating, and deleting tracer sessions.
- Added methods for reading and filtering tracer sessions with metrics.
- Added methods for managing filter views related to tracer sessions.
- Added methods for managing organizations, including member and role management.
- Updated method signature for reading tracer sessions to exclude stats.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • github-actions

Poem

In the meadow where data flows,
New endpoints bloom like springtime's shows.
Tracer sessions, we create and refine,
With filters and metrics, all will align.
Hopping through code, we celebrate,
A world of insights, oh, isn't it great! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge October 21, 2024 21:18
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Add API endpoints for managing tracer sessions and filter views Oct 21, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (5)

Line range hint 1-15: Overall structure looks good, with some suggestions for improvement

The OpenAPI 3.0.1 specification for the LangSmith API is well-structured and comprehensive. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider adding a description field to the root level to provide an overview of the API.
  2. The servers section could benefit from additional environments (e.g., development, staging) to facilitate testing and development.
  3. Consider adding tags at the root level to group operations logically.

Line range hint 16823-16844: Security schemes are well-defined, but could use more documentation

The security schemes (ApiKey, TenantId, BearerAuth, and OrganizationId) are appropriately defined. However, there are some suggestions for improvement:

  1. Add descriptions to ApiKey, TenantId, and OrganizationId schemes to explain their purpose and usage.
  2. Consider using a more specific name for the ApiKey scheme (e.g., LangSmithApiKey) to avoid confusion with other API keys.
  3. Ensure that the BearerAuth scheme is used consistently across endpoints that require authentication.

Line range hint 16-1022: Endpoints are well-structured, with some areas for improvement

The API endpoints are generally well-defined and follow a consistent pattern. However, there are some suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider adding summary and description fields to all endpoints for better documentation.
  2. Ensure consistent use of query parameters vs. request body for filtering and pagination.
  3. Some endpoints (e.g., /api/v1/datasets/{dataset_id}/runs) use POST for read operations. Consider using GET with query parameters for better RESTful design.
  4. Add tags to all operations to improve API documentation structure.

Line range hint 1023-16822: Schema definitions are comprehensive, with some suggestions for improvement

The schema definitions are well-structured and cover a wide range of resources. However, there are some areas for improvement:

  1. Consider adding description fields to all schema properties for better documentation.
  2. Ensure consistent use of nullable: true for optional properties across all schemas.
  3. Some schemas (e.g., CreateRunRequest) have inconsistent property ordering. Consider maintaining a consistent order (e.g., required properties first).
  4. For enum types (e.g., RunTypeEnum), consider adding descriptions for each enum value.
  5. Some schemas have very long lists of properties. Consider breaking them down into smaller, more focused schemas for better maintainability.

Line range hint 1-16844: Consider addressing these general issues for improved maintainability and consistency

While the OpenAPI specification is comprehensive, there are some general issues that could be addressed to improve maintainability and consistency:

  1. The file is very long (16,844 lines). Consider splitting it into multiple files for easier maintenance, using OpenAPI's $ref feature to reference external files.
  2. There are inconsistencies in naming conventions. For example, some schemas use camelCase (e.g., createRun), while others use snake_case (e.g., create_run). Standardize on one convention throughout the API.
  3. Some endpoints have inconsistent error response definitions. Standardize error responses across all endpoints.
  4. Consider adding a global responses section for common response types (e.g., 400, 401, 403, 404) to reduce repetition.
  5. The API version (v1) is hardcoded in the paths. Consider using OpenAPI's servers section with variables to make versioning more flexible.

Addressing these issues will improve the overall quality and maintainability of the API specification.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d3086e and 30efecf.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (20)
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ILangSmithApi.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ITagsClient.CreateTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ITagsClient.DeleteTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ITagsClient.GetTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ITagsClient.GetTags.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ITagsClient.UpdateTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ITagsClient.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.LangSmithApi.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.BulkExportDestinationS3Config.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.DeleteTagApiV1ReposOwnerRepoTagsTagNameDeleteResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.RepoTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.RepoTagRequest.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.RepoUpdateTagRequest.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.TagsClient.CreateTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.TagsClient.DeleteTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.TagsClient.GetTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.TagsClient.GetTags.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.TagsClient.UpdateTag.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.TagsClient.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (1)

Line range hint 1-16844: Overall, a comprehensive API specification with room for improvement

The LangSmith API OpenAPI 3.0.1 specification is well-structured and covers a wide range of functionality. It provides a solid foundation for the API, with clear endpoint definitions and detailed schema specifications. However, there are several areas where improvements can be made to enhance maintainability, consistency, and overall quality:

  1. Improve documentation by adding descriptions to schemas, properties, and endpoints.
  2. Standardize naming conventions and response formats across the API.
  3. Consider splitting the large file into smaller, more manageable pieces.
  4. Enhance security scheme documentation and consistency.
  5. Adhere more closely to RESTful principles in endpoint design.
  6. Improve schema organization and property ordering.

Implementing these suggestions will result in a more robust, maintainable, and developer-friendly API specification. Despite the areas for improvement, the current specification is approved for use, with the recommendation to address the identified issues in future iterations.

@HavenDV HavenDV disabled auto-merge October 21, 2024 22:27
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit a4a3683 into main Oct 21, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202410212117 branch October 21, 2024 22:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant