Usage Scenario Selection Criteria

Explanation of use:

The selected criteria (marked in bold) shall be used to match with the usage scenarios, in order to support all selected criteria at least once. This could mean that the scenarios are carefully adapted to meet the criteria. This modification shall be finished until 14. March. Final decision on March 4th Telco of WP1: Service Perspective: Please select either No 2 or 3 (DT Pref No2) Business Model: Please select either No 2 or 3 (DT Pref No2)

Technical:

1. Topics identified in Topics-to-Be-Addressed-in-User-Scenarios are addressed (PTIN)
2. Demonstrates Hyperty Concepts (PTIN)(DT)
3. Deals with trust and privacy issues (DT)(TUB)(Orange)
4. Scenario development (WP5) and trial (WP6) is feasible (QUOB)(FOKUS)(Orange)
5. easily extensible scenario
6. Expertise of partners on soft and or hardware (QUOB)(FOKUS)
7. Reusability of existing assets (TUB)
8. Interoperability between different Service Provider domains - no island solution (PTIN)(DT)(TUB)(Orange)
9. Extension of WebRTC to / with IoT (QUOB)
10. Reusable in several scenarios (common use cases) (FOKUS)

Business Model:

1. Show the impact of reTHINK concepts will have in the economic sphere and in society in general (PTIN)(DT)(QUOB)(FOKUS)
2. "Best" economic scenario - "best" sustainable business model (DT)(QUOB)(Orange)
3. Attractiveness for 3rd parties (PTIN)(FOKUS)(Orange)

Service perspective:

1. Innovative / Original (PTIN)(TUB)(QUOB)(FOKUS)(Orange)
2. hybrid user scenarios, e.g. H2M2H or M2H2H2M … (PTIN)(DT)(Orange)
3. Quick adaptation on other use cases (?)(FOKUS)
4. New / superior service experience (DT)(QUOB)(FOKUS)
5. Disruptiveness (due to decentralized approach) (PTIN)(TUB)(QUOB)(Orange)
6. Service Enabling (DT)(TUB)

Scientific Approach

1. What are new scientific approach and results (TUB)
2. How can we expand the scientific field with the use-cases given (DT)(TUB)
3. Is it a added-value for the research community (TUB)(QUOB)(FOKUS)(Orange)

Organizational

1. In line EU requirements?