Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADD: Like button system test #7252

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2020
Merged

ADD: Like button system test #7252

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2020

Conversation

VladimirMikulic
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #5316

@Uzay-G could you take a look at this? Thanks.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #7252 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #7252   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.59%   81.59%           
=======================================
  Files          97       97           
  Lines        5601     5601           
=======================================
  Hits         4570     4570           
  Misses       1031     1031

@Uzay-G
Copy link
Member

Uzay-G commented Jan 15, 2020

@VladimirMikulic I am busy right now but will check it out in 20 mins. It look good 👍

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

SidharthBansal commented Jan 16, 2020 via email

Copy link
Member

@Uzay-G Uzay-G left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah this is good! Maybe we could add a check to verify that the number of likes changes when the page is reloaded. I had written the test for this and I would love to hear what you think. I will post it when I get home in a few hours

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

You can write more tests. We can evaluate marks after merging all the prs. @Uzay-G I can't see your system tests prs. It will be great if you can start with system tests too. Thanks both

@Uzay-G
Copy link
Member

Uzay-G commented Jan 16, 2020

You can write more tests. We can evaluate marks after merging all the prs. @Uzay-G I can't see your system tests prs. It will be great if you can start with system tests too. Thanks both

I have one at #7254 and another one was merged at #7251

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

Trying to bypass the codecov issue...

@SidharthBansal SidharthBansal merged commit e15a4dd into publiclab:master Jan 17, 2020
@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

System test 2 task's test 1. Trying to get 4 more tasks to get your system test 2 approved too

@VladimirMikulic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SidharthBansal you can count on me :)

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

Yeah I am counting you. Policies are same for all students. Sorry if anything unfair or anything wrong I did

@VladimirMikulic
Copy link
Contributor Author

VladimirMikulic commented Jan 17, 2020

Why are you apologising? You are one of the best mentors of this GCI.
Let's be real you were with us even when you were on vacation and while you had a fever...

I appreciate that very much and I apologise if I had said something wrong or did something wrong.

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

I just thought you felt that I am not treating all the gci students equally. You have not done anything wrong :-)

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

SidharthBansal commented Jan 17, 2020

You all are really hardworking. If I was that much hardworking at your age then I would be in the skies today. :-)

@VladimirMikulic
Copy link
Contributor Author

You are a Google Tech Intern. It means that you are hardworking.

@Uzay-G
Copy link
Member

Uzay-G commented Jan 17, 2020 via email

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

SidharthBansal commented Jan 17, 2020 via email

@VladimirMikulic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SidharthBansal I completely agree with @Uzay-G.
You really have great $ uptime and you should be proud of yourself :)
I've learned a lot of great things from you.

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

Thanks

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

sending ❤️ for this convo! 🎉

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

Let's complete System tests this GCI.
I was thinking of Project-Based Mentorship in GCI which I proposed #3285 but there was not wide momentum at that time. Last year, @jywarren we did the log in modal and this year we are doing System Tests through this. I think we should reopen this issue and escalate the discussion.
The advantages are HUGE. The problem is simple. We require DEDICATED MENTORSHIP. One ongoing work is Code-based rights. When we will club these two things (Project based DEDICATED Mentorship in GCI + Code Based rights(#7271)), the GCI ladder will be better than GSoC ladder. Also, I will say, it could result in early talent hunting for Public Lab.
If you think we can go with #3285 from next GCI, we can plan in that direction too in February. Please feel free to reopen the issue.

Suggestions needed
Thanks
Sidharth

@VladimirMikulic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow, it is a really cool idea. We should first define what needs to be done and then split it into smaller issues.

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

This is a really EPIC thing to discuss. I will escalate it at the end of GCI

vinitshahdeo pushed a commit to vinitshahdeo/plots2 that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2020
NitinBhasneria pushed a commit to NitinBhasneria/plots2 that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants