Bug 1732214: Fix panic when binding already exists

[ecordell]

This is a manual cherry-pick of #959

@cblecker

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1732302: Fix panic when binding already exists

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1732911: Fix panic when binding already exists

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected the bug to target the "4.1.z" release, but it targets "4.2.0" instead
• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1732302: Fix panic when binding already exists

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ecordell]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected the bug to target the "4.1.z" release, but it targets "4.2.0" instead
• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ecordell]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ecordell]

/retest

[cblecker]

/lgtm

@ecordell I think there was two BZs opened.. the original (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732214) and the one @jianzhangbjz opened (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732302). I don't know if that makes a difference in resolving the invalid-bug label

[openshift-ci-robot]

@cblecker: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

@ecordell I think there was two BZs opened.. the original (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732214) and the one @jianzhangbjz opened (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732302). I don't know if that makes a difference in resolving the invalid-bug label

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ecordell]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references a valid Bugzilla bug. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[njhale]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cblecker, ecordell, njhale

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ecordell,njhale]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected the bug to target the "4.1.z" release, but it targets "4.2.0" instead
• expected dependent Bugzilla bug to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1733324: Fix panic when binding already exists

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ecordell]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected the bug to target the "4.1.z" release, but it targets "4.2.0" instead
• expected dependent Bugzilla bug to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ecordell]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references an invalid Bugzilla bug:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[eparis]

@cblecker FYI Evan's got the bugs and PRs all set up perfectly now. We have a bug with target release 4.2 (1732302) which 'blocks' a bug with target release 4.1 (1733324). And now the bot is telling us that 1733324 (4.2) is not yet verified by QE. Once that bug goes VERIFIED we should run /bugzilla refresh again.

Thank you both!

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: This pull request references a valid Bugzilla bug. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1732214: Fix panic when binding already exists

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[derekwaynecarr]

/retest

[ecordell]

/retest

[ecordell]

/retest

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ecordell: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. The Bugzilla bug has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1732214: Fix panic when binding already exists

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.