-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add option to explain to explain all incoherencies #686
Comments
Sounds good. Is there someone you can assign to this? |
this ticket is redundant with #329 |
Why redundant: 1) list of unsats and 2) root unsats both described in more detailed in #329 |
matentzn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2020
see #686 (comment) Another method for avoiding redundant explanations.
beckyjackson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2021
* Updated explain command Various updates * Update CHANGELOG.md * Render source ontology of axioms in Markdown see #329 (comment) * Added new option for unsats: most_general see #686 (comment) Another method for avoiding redundant explanations. * Create uvula_multiple_unsat_all_explanation.md Added because missing for CI testing * Added missing examples * Adding a bit of determinism to subset unsat * Regularise order of axiom summary * Regularise list of unsat order * Some last fixes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently explain requires an axiom. If we know in advance X is unsat, we can ask for an explanation for
X SubClassOf Nothing
Sometimes we may want to get all incoherencies explained
E.g. in the COB pipeline I want to make a report of all incoherencies
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: