forked from spack/spack
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Telcon: 2015 09 10
Todd Gamblin edited this page Sep 10, 2015
·
7 revisions
- Todd Gamblin (LLNL)
- Mike Collette (LLNL)
- Gregory Becker (LLNL)
- Lots of pull requests are accumulating. I'm working on integrating these.
- Top priorities:
- Greg Becker's database PR
- Jim's Open|SpeedShop PR
- Matt's External repositories
- From Justin Too (ROSE compiler team):
- From Rasmus Wriedt Larsen:
- PR for the Fish shell
- Link to Fish Shell for those interested
- Multiple requests lately for Lmod support and module hierarchies (from CINECA and U. Pitt.)
- Timo Bremer at LLNL has started getting Lmod packaged, maybe others.
- If others want to work on this I'm happy to help answer questions.
- Would be very useful in general; need something like it for Cray machines too.
- LLNL NextGen code team was able to resolve environment issues on Rhea at ORNL
- Issues with LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- Issues with ccache getting included in the environment turned out to be user's environment
- Might need a command-line switch to enable/disable user environment inclusion in the build.
- Let people get things built, then focus on how to make it reproducible.
-
Another long path issue for installed Python scripts
- Greg Lee reported similar issue previously
- What are some good ways to deal with this? Can't really do much about a long spack prefix.
- could consider reducing
opt/spack
part of prefix in Spack. - Could shorten human-readable compiler and arch prefix, but it is useful for understanding install layout
- Need to move more variants into hash.
- could consider reducing
- System installs should probably be someplace short!
-
/spack
? -
/usr/tce
(for TOSS3)?
-
-
The Spack telcon is open; all are welcome to ask questions!
-
Mike had a rough week with Spack
- Getting flags synched among packages is still difficult and needs to be changed in too many places.
- Need C99 flags and consolidated flags for compilers
-
Mike still needs better boost package testing
- Boost package needs to pass proper toolkit to non-GNU compilers
- Wants to be able to build consistently (currently
depends_on('boost%gcc')
)
-
Jim still waiting on PR integration for O|SS
- Not sure that the next release of O|SS can use Spack as installer w/o:
- external packages
- module prereqs
- One after that maybe.
- Spack support can proceed separately from O|SS release and replace existing installer when it's ready.
- Not sure that the next release of O|SS can use Spack as installer w/o: