-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Identify v1Beta1 API candidates and potential gaps #1869
Comments
/milestone v0.10 |
I would add
For instance
|
/milestone v0.10.0 |
documentation should be one a criteria as well |
As we make those decisions maybe we could also document criteria and how we version APIs - and add to knative docs? |
@akashrv I think I will start a document like this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/149LMccHt-gFEG52XoauVG2f-crjMk3-biu-pJPQGxCo/edit I think that serving did well w/ their APIs, so I guess this is good for eventing too |
Sounds good. If you could start a draft in eventing shared drive, we can
all then pitch in and add to it.
…On Thu, Sep 19, 2019, 08:13 Matthias Wessendorf ***@***.***> wrote:
@akashrv <https://github.com/akashrv> I think I will start a document
like this:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/149LMccHt-gFEG52XoauVG2f-crjMk3-biu-pJPQGxCo/edit
I think that serving did well w/ their APIs, so I guess this is good for
eventing too
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1869?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKYQBFCB7L5XY66CUQDGGI3QKOJI5A5CNFSM4IVWWJZ2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7D2MJA#issuecomment-533177892>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYQBFADVVPAXTB5PA7CXC3QKOJI5ANCNFSM4IVWWJZQ>
.
|
related to #1976 |
@matzew @vaikas-google Were you able to make any progress on this? Given we have just 2 weeks left for v10 milestone, shall we prioritize this work? |
Since we're still making API changes in v10 that haven't landed yet (destination), I think that rushing beta API version in the next 2 weeks probably isn't the best idea. If we're happy with the changes that are going in, perhaps a v1beta1 candidate for v11 is more realistic. We added an item to the WG agenda for this week to discuss a task force to solidify this API. We did this for knative serving several months ago and that process worked well. |
We're still trying to distill what the changes are, once we figure them out, then it would be useful to understand in the context of the actual Deltas to see how likely things are to land or not. |
I agree. In the channel task force we spoke about parts of Between 0.10 and 0.11 we should see that we get a list, to be promoted by 0.12 or 0.13 ? |
Mike, sign me up for that task force. I started a document, will share
later tonight or tomorrow
-M
On Tue 15. Oct 2019 at 19:32, Mike Helmick ***@***.***> wrote:
Since we're still making API changes in v10 that haven't landed yet
(destination), I think that rushing beta API version in the next 2 weeks
probably isn't the best idea. If we're happy with the changes that are
going in, perhaps a v1beta1 candidate for v11 is more realistic.
We added an item to the WG agenda for this week to discuss a task force to
solidify this API. We did this for knative serving several months ago and
that process worked well.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1869?email_source=notifications&email_token=AABGPTSUOAWOYO4IWBY4WQ3QOX5AXA5CNFSM4IVWWJZ2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEBJS5JQ#issuecomment-542322342>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABGPTXQJGT3VUQALNYGN23QOX5AXANCNFSM4IVWWJZQ>
.
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
|
I will join. I like APIs. |
@matzew @vaikas-google would like to join the taskforce |
/milestone v0.12.0 |
Problem
We need to figure out v1beta1 api surface for Knative Eventing. We could either start moving stable apis to v1beta1, or identify a minimum set of apis that make sense to promote together to v1beta1 and identify what is missing so that we can target to fill the gaps in v0.10 and promote to v1beta1 in v0.11
Exit Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: