-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests/r/fsx: Add sweeper concurrency #18626
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me 🚀
input := &fsx.DescribeFileSystemsInput{} | ||
|
||
err = conn.DescribeFileSystemsPages(input, func(page *fsx.DescribeFileSystemsOutput, lastPage bool) bool { | ||
err = conn.DescribeFileSystemsPages(input, func(page *fsx.DescribeFileSystemsOutput, isLast bool) bool { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Prevalent convention for anonymous paginator functions is to name the 2nd parameter lastPage
Of course there's no enforcement so it is murky:
$ ag --stats-only 'Pages\(.*lastPage'
227 matches
$ ag --stats-only 'Pages\(.*isLast'
84 matches
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh no!!! I was just going on the contributing docs and changed all the WAFs the wrong way!
This has been released in version 3.36.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks! |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Community Note
Relates #15334
Output from acceptance testing: N/A