Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

emboss implement missing parameters #4734

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor

FOR CONTRIBUTOR:

  • - I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document and this tool is appropriate for the tools-iuc repo.
  • - License permits unrestricted use (educational + commercial)
  • - This PR adds a new tool or tool collection
  • - This PR updates an existing tool or tool collection
  • - This PR does something else (explain below)

@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias mentioned this pull request Aug 19, 2022
59 tasks
@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias changed the title Topic/emboss param emboss implement missing parameters Aug 19, 2022
@bgruening
Copy link
Member

This is not a tool suite so it will bump all tools. Are any other changes we want to include here? Should we bump all tool versions?

<description>Search sequence documentation. Slow, use SRS and Entrez!</description>
<expand macro="bio_tools" />
<macros>
<import>macros.xml</import>
</macros>
<expand macro="requirements" />
<code file="emboss_format_corrector.py" />
<command>textsearch -sequence '$input1' -outfile '$out_file1' -pattern '$pattern' -casesensitive -heading $heading -usa $usa -accession $accession -name $search_name -description $description -html
<command>textsearch
-sequence '$input1' -outfile '$out_file1' -pattern '$pattern' -casesensitive $casesensitive -heading $heading -usa $usa -accession $accession -name $search_name -description $description -html
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe split this with one option per line?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this would be nicer, but then we should do it consistently in all emboss tools. Don't think that I have the time for this.

there is no such dataype in Galaxy and also the CLI does not support
this value.

to my surprise the other datatypes all existed in Galaxy .. so lets use
them
@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2022
21 tasks
@bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is not a tool suite so it will bump all tools. Are any other changes we want to include here? Should we bump all tool versions?

I have no more changes that I want to include. Don't know about bumping. Can you tell me?

at some time in the past we changed from 5.0.0.1 to 5.0.0+galaxy2
which was wrong since `"+" < "." == True`.

fixes galaxyproject#4829
@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2024
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants