Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix tx buffer inconsistency if there are duplicate keys in one tx. #17228

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

siyuanfoundation
Copy link
Contributor

@siyuanfoundation siyuanfoundation commented Jan 11, 2024

Signed-off-by: Siyuan Zhang <sizhang@google.com>
…bucket.

Signed-off-by: Siyuan Zhang <sizhang@google.com>
@siyuanfoundation
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@siyuanfoundation
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @serathius @ahrtr

Copy link
Member

@fuweid fuweid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@ahrtr ahrtr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please also backport the PR to 3.5 and 3.4.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Jan 12, 2024

Please also backport the PR to 3.5 and 3.4.

Please read #17234

@ahrtr ahrtr merged commit ed99424 into etcd-io:main Jan 12, 2024
41 checks passed
@serathius
Copy link
Member

High chance this PR caused #17247

ahrtr added a commit to ahrtr/etcd that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Actually pull/17228 was fixing a non-exist issue, because there
will never have duplicated items. Please refer to
etcd-io#17247 (comment).

The PR also introduces a bug (issues/17247).

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <benjamin.ahrtr@gmail.com>
@siyuanfoundation siyuanfoundation mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2024
ahrtr added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants