-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release v0.0.8
#471
Release v0.0.8
#471
Conversation
This matches all the other unreleased crates
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
(I want to do some testing on the build artifacts before merging this) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great.
Also very good points for discussion about publishing and versioning.
Re: whether to publish all crates under the same version number, i can see good arguments for and against, need to think about it more.
* master: Update README to include new Docker Compose instructions. (#482) Change container distro to Debian and Ubuntu to avoid runtime errors. (#481) Remove old Docker related script (#478) Release `v0.0.8` (#471) Add `prune_registration` extrinsic (#472) standard formatting + lil fixes (#477) Revert nightly changes to format script (#470) Add way for validators to resolve diff verifying keys (#460) Fix socket addres type (#469) Reduce `authoring_version` and add `RuntimeVersion` comments (#467)
This PR gets everything in line for the
v0.0.8
release.During this some questions have come up for me regarding the release flow. We don't need
to answer all of these now, but we should at least keep them in mind:
follow it's on SemVer, or publish as a workspace (so all published crates have the same
version number)?
publish vs. keep private?
runtime
andpallet
weight.rs
files?tbh