-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nano branches from ValueMap of elaborated types #43916
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ | |||
#include "DataFormats/Candidate/interface/Candidate.h" | |||
typedef SimpleFlatTableProducer<reco::Candidate> SimpleCandidateFlatTableProducer; | |||
|
|||
typedef SimpleTypedExternalFlatTableProducer<reco::Candidate, reco::Candidate> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a dummy producer that would have to be removed in the final PR
meant to help with #43525 |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43916/38766 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
FYI @mbluj |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43916/38767
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
enable nano |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43916/38781
|
A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant (vlimant) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @hqucms, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43916/38810
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e7e804/37371/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Many thanks @vlimant! I am moving my development on top of it. |
+1 |
For reference: backported to 14_0_X in #44040. |
PR description:
in order to enable table extension, using elaborated types (other than int, float, ...) some specific templated producer need to be added. no change of existing branch/module are introduced.
PR validation:
the nano matrix succeeded.