-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run3-alca142 Modify the datastream for HcalIsolatedBunchSelector #41510
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41510/35384
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @tvami, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
@bsunanda @mariadalfonso I think this is not what we agreed last time. Last time we agreed that |
@cmsbuild , please abort
|
@tvami We can remove HcalCalIsolatedBunchFilter from the matrix to be used. Can HcalCalIsolatedBunchSelector stay unchanged? We can make these changes now. |
@bsunanda I didnt mean to remove it just from the matrix, but completely remove it from CMSSW. It is a dupplicate after all... |
@tvami I have removed the IsolatedBunchFilter from all Configuration packages. Which is the wf that runs the AlCaReco matrix which needs to be set? |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41510/35440
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-698ea0/32434/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
There must be a misunderstanding here. This PR is not relevant for data taking, the AlCaRECO matrix dict is only used in the rereco, i.e. not urgent until October. T0 has FYI @mariadalfonso (I feel like we are going back and forth between these HCAL isobunch ALCARECOs -- but given that they are supposed to do the same thing, maybe it doesnt matter...) |
@tvami Please approve this PR. I cannot make a separate PR to remove the duplicate code unless this PR is merged. |
@bsunanda I'm sorry by why couldn't you? Also, as I've been trying to say for a month now, this PR is not relevant for data taking, see #41510 (comment) |
I mean, just make other commits to this PR. |
@tvami I have one more branch ready to be submitted - just waiting for this PR to be merged |
@perrotta Could you please merge this now? |
@cmsbuild please test workflow 1001.2,1001.3,1002.3,1002.4 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-698ea0/32839/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
Modify the datastream for HcalIsolatedBunchSelector
PR validation:
Add HcalIsolatedBunchSelector AlCaReco to the Commissioning data stream
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
May be needed to backport this to 13_0_X