Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Xi, Chi_c and Chi_b to the matrix for RelVals. #38494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2022

Conversation

AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

@AdrianoDee AdrianoDee commented Jun 24, 2022

PR description:

Adding Xi, Chi_c and Chi_b wfs to the list of the upgrade wfs to be used in the release validation studies.

Restoring proper ordering for Bu and Psi workflows.

Note that, if #38466 goes in, the naming, the number of events and jobs will be changed accordingly for the Xi wf.

PR validation:

Tested with 11715.0, 11716.0 and 11717.0.
Tested with 11739.0, 11740.0, 11741.0, 11742.0, 11743.0.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38494/30718

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @trtomei, @beaucero, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • workflow = 11715.0,11716.0,11717.0

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@jordan-martins
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

Note that, if #38466 goes in, the naming, the number of events and jobs will be changed accordingly for the Xi wf.

I would expect #38466 can get finally signed by @cms-sw/generators-l2 once the tests finish for it, and the intention is to merge it right after. Perhaps we can save time if you rename accordingly in this PR since now, and test it together with #38466 to avoid crashes

@Saptaparna
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, exactly! Will sign the #38466 as soon as possible.

@@ -2299,6 +2299,9 @@ def __init__(self, howMuch, dataset):
('BsToJpsiPhi_mumuKK_14TeV_TuneCP5_cfi', UpgradeFragment(Kby(910,9090),'BsToJpsiPhi_mumuKK_14TeV')), # 1.1%
('BuToJPsiPrimeKToJPsiPiPiK_14TeV_TuneCP5_pythia8_cfi', UpgradeFragment(Kby(223,2222),'BuToJPsiPrimeKToJPsiPiPiK_14TeV')), # 5.7%
('Psi2SToJPsiPiPi_14TeV_TuneCP5_pythia8_cfi', UpgradeFragment(Kby(45,500),'Psi2SToJPsiPiPi_14TeV')), # 24.6%
('XiMinus_14TeV_SoftQCDInel_TuneCP5_cfi', UpgradeFragment(Kby(9000,90000),'XiMinus_14TeV')), #1.1% (2%)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Historically, we have added new fragments to the end of the list to avoid changing the workflow numbers for existing fragments. @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 should comment if this policy should still be followed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think a modifications just like this just went into the release. But whatever the policy I'll follow it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this #38397 is a mistake. We should preserve the order of the workflow. FYI @kskovpen

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Adriano, my apologies, let's preserve the order, as was mentioned by @kpedro88 and @srimanob. I keep forgetting about this restriction.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@AdrianoDee AdrianoDee Jun 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll fix it for both. No prob

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Adriano!

Copy link
Contributor Author

@AdrianoDee AdrianoDee Jun 24, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be properly ordered now, and sorry for signing hasty #38397.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f9e1ed/25759/summary.html
COMMIT: 8fda236
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-24-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38494/25759/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f9e1ed/25759/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f9e1ed/25759/git-merge-result

  • DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 11725.0DAS Error
  • 11925.0DAS Error

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 61 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3659125
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 64
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3659019
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 87831.70199999998 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0 ): 5.561 KiB AlCaReco/TkAlDiMuonAndVertex
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10024.0,... ): 200.027 KiB GEM/RecHits
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10024.0,... ): 7.764 KiB GEM/Digis
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 2034.563 KiB GEM/EventInfo
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 456.305 KiB GEM/RecHits
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 202.308 KiB GEM/DAQStatus
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 77.393 KiB GEM/Digis
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4,... ): 1798.537 KiB GEM/EventInfo
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4,... ): 353.492 KiB GEM/RecHits
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4,... ): 194.687 KiB GEM/DAQStatus
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4 ): ...
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

 - restoring proper ordering in relvals also for Bu and Psi
@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38494/30722

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #38494 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again.

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f9e1ed/25767/summary.html
COMMIT: 6061018
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-24-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38494/25767/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f9e1ed/25767/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f9e1ed/25767/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 61 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3659125
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 17
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 63
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3659023
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 87831.70599999998 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0 ): 5.561 KiB AlCaReco/TkAlDiMuonAndVertex
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10024.0,... ): 200.027 KiB GEM/RecHits
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10024.0,... ): 7.764 KiB GEM/Digis
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 2034.563 KiB GEM/EventInfo
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 456.305 KiB GEM/RecHits
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 202.308 KiB GEM/DAQStatus
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 77.393 KiB GEM/Digis
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4,... ): 1798.537 KiB GEM/EventInfo
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4,... ): 353.492 KiB GEM/RecHits
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4,... ): 194.687 KiB GEM/DAQStatus
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4 ): ...
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 what is the status of this PR? Do you still intend to include its backport into 12_4_1?

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor Author

+upgrade
Add BPH wf to relval productions.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ef88464 into cms-sw:master Jun 28, 2022
@AdrianoDee AdrianoDee deleted the bph_wfs_125 branch February 17, 2023 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants