[12_4_X] Adding BPH wfs to relval matrix

[AdrianoDee]

This is a backport of #38397 and #38494. It adds to the the list of the upgrade wfs to be used in the release validation studies the following fragments:

• BuToJPsiPrimeKToJPsiPiPiK
• Psi2SToJPsiPiPi
• XiMinus_14TeV
• Chib1PToUpsilon1SGamma
• ChicToJpsiGamma

Note that, if #38467 goes in, the naming, the number of events and jobs will be changed accordingly for the Xi wf.

PR validation:

Tested with 11715.0, 11716.0, 11717.0, 11718.0, 11719.0.
Tested with 11739.0, 11740.0, 11741.0, 11742.0, 11743.0.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @trtomei, @beaucero, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Adding Xi, Chi_c and Chi_b to the matrix for RelVals. #38494

[AdrianoDee]

test parameters:

• workflow = 11715.0,11716.0,11717.0,11718.0,11719.0

[jordan-martins]

+1

[AdrianoDee]

please test

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b1eac1/25761/summary.html
COMMIT: abfd3f3
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-06-24-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38495/25761/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

• DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

RelVals-INPUT

• 11725.0DAS Error
• 11925.0DAS Error

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3680359
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3680329
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #38495 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again.

[AdrianoDee]

test parameters:

• workflow = 11739.0,11740.0,11741.0,11742.0,11743.0
• pull_request = [12_4_X] Update XiMinus_14TeV_SoftQCDInel_TuneCP5_cfi config #38467

[AdrianoDee]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b1eac1/25771/summary.html
COMMIT: e241b7b
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-06-24-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38495/25771/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3680359
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3680329
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

backport of #38494

[perrotta]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 is this needed for 12_4_1?

[kskovpen]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 is this needed for 12_4_1?

These workflows were added for them to be included in the next release validation campaigns, and therefore we don't need them in 12_4_1.

[mmusich]

These workflows were added for them to be included in the next release validation campaigns, and therefore we don't need them in 12_4_1.

@kskovpen @AdrianoDee wouldn't they be desirable to check the "revert to CKF for pixel-less" thingy?

[AdrianoDee]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 is this needed for 12_4_1?

These workflows were added for them to be included in the next release validation campaigns, and therefore we don't need them in 12_4_1.

Hi @kskovpen couldn't this help for the incoming validation production for the mkfit pixelles rollback?

[kskovpen]

Hi All, could you remind me which JIRA is that (if any)?

[mmusich]

hi @kskovpen : https://its.cern.ch/jira/projects/PDMVRELVALS/issues/PDMVRELVALS-153?filter=allissues

[kskovpen]

Thanks! Then I take it back. Needed for 12_4_1.

[mmusich]

Needed for 12_4_1.

could you sign it, then :) ? Thanks a lot.

[kskovpen]

Gosh! I am in anarchy mode today, sorry! Signing

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

[jordan-martins]

@AdrianoDee please, sign as upgrade :)
12_4_1 is on the verge to be built

[AdrianoDee]

+upgrade

Adding bph wf to relvals

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1