Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2-hgx300 Fix the rotation angle of layers in V16 geometry of HGCal #36945

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Fix the rotation angle of layers in V16 geometry of HGCal

PR validation:

Tested using muon tomography

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36945/28289

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Geometry/HGCalCommonData (geometry, upgrade)

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda
Is this ready to go for testing?

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9c903b/22383/summary.html
COMMIT: a3a1e91
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2022-02-13-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/36945/22383/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 7252 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 46
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3764435
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 98673
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 121
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3665619
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 45 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 193 log files, 42 edm output root files, 46 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

Do we need the PR for D88 validation?
FYI @perrotta @qliphy

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Feb 14, 2022 via email

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

The change is on Phase2 D86 and D88 which should be expected from this bug fix PR. I assume the validation will be done with CMSSW_12_3_0_pre5. I'm not sure if any plot in the PR test can confirm the fix.

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 15, 2022

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants