Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - add #[reflect(Default)] to create default value for reflected types #3733

Closed

Conversation

jakobhellermann
Copy link
Contributor

@jakobhellermann jakobhellermann commented Jan 20, 2022

Problem

It currently isn't possible to construct the default value of a reflected type. Because of that, it isn't possible to use add_component of ReflectComponent to add a new component to an entity because you can't know what the initial value should be.

Solution

  1. add ReflectDefault type
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct ReflectDefault {
    default: fn() -> Box<dyn Reflect>,
}

impl ReflectDefault {
    pub fn default(&self) -> Box<dyn Reflect> {
        (self.default)()
    }
}

impl<T: Reflect + Default> FromType<T> for ReflectDefault {
    fn from_type() -> Self {
        ReflectDefault {
            default: || Box::new(T::default()),
        }
    }
}
  1. add #[reflect(Default)] to all component types that implement Default and are user facing (so not ComputedSize, CubemapVisibleEntities etc.)

This makes it possible to add the default value of a component to an entity without any compile-time information:

fn main() {
    let mut app = App::new();
    app.register_type::<Camera>();

    let type_registry = app.world.get_resource::<TypeRegistry>().unwrap();
    let type_registry = type_registry.read();

    let camera_registration = type_registry.get(std::any::TypeId::of::<Camera>()).unwrap();
    let reflect_default = camera_registration.data::<ReflectDefault>().unwrap();
    let reflect_component = camera_registration
        .data::<ReflectComponent>()
        .unwrap()
        .clone();

    let default = reflect_default.default();

    drop(type_registry);

    let entity = app.world.spawn().id();
    reflect_component.add_component(&mut app.world, entity, &*default);

    let camera = app.world.entity(entity).get::<Camera>().unwrap();
    dbg!(&camera);
}

Open questions

  • should we have ReflectDefault or ReflectFromWorld or both?

@jakobhellermann jakobhellermann added A-Reflection Runtime information about types C-Enhancement A new feature labels Jan 20, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the S-Needs-Triage This issue needs to be labelled label Jan 20, 2022
@jakobhellermann jakobhellermann removed the S-Needs-Triage This issue needs to be labelled label Jan 20, 2022
@jakobhellermann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe ReflectDefault should return a Box<dyn Any> and we could have a way to go from &Any -> &Reflect? That way you could also use default values for types where reflect isn't implemented.

@MrGVSV
Copy link
Member

MrGVSV commented Mar 6, 2022

  • should we have ReflectDefault or ReflectFromWorld or both?

Personally, I think we should add both because there will probably be cases where we need to create the "default" from world state using ReflectFromWorld. But we also need ReflectDefault to be able to create an instance when we don't have or need the world.

Copy link
Member

@MrGVSV MrGVSV left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

I think if you do want to add ReflectFromWorld, maybe that should go in another PR? I think this one is pretty good as is.

use crate::{FromType, Reflect};

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct ReflectDefault {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: I know it's a relatively straightforward struct, but I think a doc comment could still be nice.

@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ mod impls {
}

pub mod serde;
pub mod std_traits;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this module. It makes it obvious where to find std-based Reflect*** structs.

Though, imo this module should also be put in the prelude since I can see them being used a lot (as far as reflection usage goes at least haha).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this makes more sense to go in prelude. Would be annoying to want to slap standard derives on a component and need to add one additional import to do that.

@MrGVSV
Copy link
Member

MrGVSV commented Apr 23, 2022

Maybe ReflectDefault should return a Box<dyn Any> and we could have a way to go from &Any -> &Reflect? That way you could also use default values for types where reflect isn't implemented.

Can you go from &dyn Any to &dyn Reflect? I'm not sure that's possible (at least not easily).

Copy link
Contributor

@PROMETHIA-27 PROMETHIA-27 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is a really solid, and probably quite important addition. Would be incredibly helpful for any use case of reflection.

@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ mod impls {
}

pub mod serde;
pub mod std_traits;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this makes more sense to go in prelude. Would be annoying to want to slap standard derives on a component and need to add one additional import to do that.

Copy link
Member

@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very simple and solid. @jakobhellermann can you rebase and add the module the std_traits module to the prelude?

@jakobhellermann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased and added std_traits to the bevy_reflect prelude.

@alice-i-cecile
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
…#3733)

### Problem
It currently isn't possible to construct the default value of a reflected type. Because of that, it isn't possible to use `add_component` of `ReflectComponent` to add a new component to an entity because you can't know what the initial value should be.

### Solution

1. add `ReflectDefault` type
```rust
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct ReflectDefault {
    default: fn() -> Box<dyn Reflect>,
}

impl ReflectDefault {
    pub fn default(&self) -> Box<dyn Reflect> {
        (self.default)()
    }
}

impl<T: Reflect + Default> FromType<T> for ReflectDefault {
    fn from_type() -> Self {
        ReflectDefault {
            default: || Box::new(T::default()),
        }
    }
}
```

2. add `#[reflect(Default)]` to all component types that implement `Default` and are user facing (so not `ComputedSize`, `CubemapVisibleEntities` etc.)



This makes it possible to add the default value of a component to an entity without any compile-time information:

```rust
fn main() {
    let mut app = App::new();
    app.register_type::<Camera>();

    let type_registry = app.world.get_resource::<TypeRegistry>().unwrap();
    let type_registry = type_registry.read();

    let camera_registration = type_registry.get(std::any::TypeId::of::<Camera>()).unwrap();
    let reflect_default = camera_registration.data::<ReflectDefault>().unwrap();
    let reflect_component = camera_registration
        .data::<ReflectComponent>()
        .unwrap()
        .clone();

    let default = reflect_default.default();

    drop(type_registry);

    let entity = app.world.spawn().id();
    reflect_component.add_component(&mut app.world, entity, &*default);

    let camera = app.world.entity(entity).get::<Camera>().unwrap();
    dbg!(&camera);
}
```

### Open questions
- should we have `ReflectDefault` or `ReflectFromWorld` or both?
@bors bors bot changed the title add #[reflect(Default)] to create default value for reflected types [Merged by Bors] - add #[reflect(Default)] to create default value for reflected types May 3, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this May 3, 2022
exjam pushed a commit to exjam/bevy that referenced this pull request May 22, 2022
…bevyengine#3733)

### Problem
It currently isn't possible to construct the default value of a reflected type. Because of that, it isn't possible to use `add_component` of `ReflectComponent` to add a new component to an entity because you can't know what the initial value should be.

### Solution

1. add `ReflectDefault` type
```rust
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct ReflectDefault {
    default: fn() -> Box<dyn Reflect>,
}

impl ReflectDefault {
    pub fn default(&self) -> Box<dyn Reflect> {
        (self.default)()
    }
}

impl<T: Reflect + Default> FromType<T> for ReflectDefault {
    fn from_type() -> Self {
        ReflectDefault {
            default: || Box::new(T::default()),
        }
    }
}
```

2. add `#[reflect(Default)]` to all component types that implement `Default` and are user facing (so not `ComputedSize`, `CubemapVisibleEntities` etc.)



This makes it possible to add the default value of a component to an entity without any compile-time information:

```rust
fn main() {
    let mut app = App::new();
    app.register_type::<Camera>();

    let type_registry = app.world.get_resource::<TypeRegistry>().unwrap();
    let type_registry = type_registry.read();

    let camera_registration = type_registry.get(std::any::TypeId::of::<Camera>()).unwrap();
    let reflect_default = camera_registration.data::<ReflectDefault>().unwrap();
    let reflect_component = camera_registration
        .data::<ReflectComponent>()
        .unwrap()
        .clone();

    let default = reflect_default.default();

    drop(type_registry);

    let entity = app.world.spawn().id();
    reflect_component.add_component(&mut app.world, entity, &*default);

    let camera = app.world.entity(entity).get::<Camera>().unwrap();
    dbg!(&camera);
}
```

### Open questions
- should we have `ReflectDefault` or `ReflectFromWorld` or both?
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2022
…4140)

# Objective

Currently, `FromReflect` makes a couple assumptions:

* Ignored fields must implement `Default`
* Active fields must implement `FromReflect`
* The reflected must be fully populated for active fields (can't use an empty `DynamicStruct`)

However, one or both of these requirements might be unachievable, such as for external types. In these cases, it might be nice to tell `FromReflect` to use a custom default.

## Solution

Added the `#[reflect(default)]` derive helper attribute. This attribute can be applied to any field (ignored or not) and will allow a default value to be specified in place of the regular `from_reflect()` call. 

It takes two forms: `#[reflect(default)]` and `#[reflect(default = "some_func")]`. The former specifies that `Default::default()` should be used while the latter specifies that `some_func()` should be used. This is pretty much [how serde does it](https://serde.rs/field-attrs.html#default).

### Example

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
struct MyStruct {
  // Use `Default::default()`
  #[reflect(default)]
  foo: String,

  // Use `get_bar_default()`
  #[reflect(default = "get_bar_default")]
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

fn get_bar_default() -> usize {
  123
}
```

### Active Fields

As an added benefit, this also allows active fields to be completely missing from their dynamic object. This is because the attribute tells `FromReflect` how to handle missing active fields (it still tries to use `from_reflect` first so the `FromReflect` trait is still required).

```rust
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();

// We can do this without actually including the active fields since they have `#[reflect(default)]`
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

### Container Defaults

Also, with the addition of #3733, people will likely start adding `#[reflect(Default)]` to their types now. Just like with the fields, we can use this to mark the entire container as "defaultable". This grants us the ability to completely remove the field markers altogether if our type implements `Default` (and we're okay with fields using that instead of their own `Default` impls):

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
#[reflect(Default)]
struct MyStruct {
  foo: String,
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

impl Default for MyStruct {
  fn default() -> Self {
    Self {
      foo: String::from("Hello"),
      bar: 123,
    }
  }
}

// Again, we can now construct this from nothing pretty much
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

Now if _any_ field is missing when using `FromReflect`, we simply fallback onto the container's `Default` implementation.

This behavior can be completely overridden on a per-field basis, of course, by simply defining those same field attributes like before.

### Related

* #3733
* #1395
* #2377

---

## Changelog

* Added `#[reflect(default)]` field attribute for `FromReflect`
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value when using `FromReflect`
  * `#[reflect(default)]` - Use the field's `Default` implementation
  * `#[reflect(default = "some_fn")]` - Use a custom function to get the default value
* Allow `#[reflect(Default)]` to have a secondary usage as a container attribute
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value based on the container's `Default` impl when using `FromReflect`


Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2022
…4140)

# Objective

Currently, `FromReflect` makes a couple assumptions:

* Ignored fields must implement `Default`
* Active fields must implement `FromReflect`
* The reflected must be fully populated for active fields (can't use an empty `DynamicStruct`)

However, one or both of these requirements might be unachievable, such as for external types. In these cases, it might be nice to tell `FromReflect` to use a custom default.

## Solution

Added the `#[reflect(default)]` derive helper attribute. This attribute can be applied to any field (ignored or not) and will allow a default value to be specified in place of the regular `from_reflect()` call. 

It takes two forms: `#[reflect(default)]` and `#[reflect(default = "some_func")]`. The former specifies that `Default::default()` should be used while the latter specifies that `some_func()` should be used. This is pretty much [how serde does it](https://serde.rs/field-attrs.html#default).

### Example

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
struct MyStruct {
  // Use `Default::default()`
  #[reflect(default)]
  foo: String,

  // Use `get_bar_default()`
  #[reflect(default = "get_bar_default")]
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

fn get_bar_default() -> usize {
  123
}
```

### Active Fields

As an added benefit, this also allows active fields to be completely missing from their dynamic object. This is because the attribute tells `FromReflect` how to handle missing active fields (it still tries to use `from_reflect` first so the `FromReflect` trait is still required).

```rust
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();

// We can do this without actually including the active fields since they have `#[reflect(default)]`
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

### Container Defaults

Also, with the addition of #3733, people will likely start adding `#[reflect(Default)]` to their types now. Just like with the fields, we can use this to mark the entire container as "defaultable". This grants us the ability to completely remove the field markers altogether if our type implements `Default` (and we're okay with fields using that instead of their own `Default` impls):

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
#[reflect(Default)]
struct MyStruct {
  foo: String,
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

impl Default for MyStruct {
  fn default() -> Self {
    Self {
      foo: String::from("Hello"),
      bar: 123,
    }
  }
}

// Again, we can now construct this from nothing pretty much
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

Now if _any_ field is missing when using `FromReflect`, we simply fallback onto the container's `Default` implementation.

This behavior can be completely overridden on a per-field basis, of course, by simply defining those same field attributes like before.

### Related

* #3733
* #1395
* #2377

---

## Changelog

* Added `#[reflect(default)]` field attribute for `FromReflect`
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value when using `FromReflect`
  * `#[reflect(default)]` - Use the field's `Default` implementation
  * `#[reflect(default = "some_fn")]` - Use a custom function to get the default value
* Allow `#[reflect(Default)]` to have a secondary usage as a container attribute
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value based on the container's `Default` impl when using `FromReflect`


Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
james7132 pushed a commit to james7132/bevy that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
…evyengine#4140)

# Objective

Currently, `FromReflect` makes a couple assumptions:

* Ignored fields must implement `Default`
* Active fields must implement `FromReflect`
* The reflected must be fully populated for active fields (can't use an empty `DynamicStruct`)

However, one or both of these requirements might be unachievable, such as for external types. In these cases, it might be nice to tell `FromReflect` to use a custom default.

## Solution

Added the `#[reflect(default)]` derive helper attribute. This attribute can be applied to any field (ignored or not) and will allow a default value to be specified in place of the regular `from_reflect()` call. 

It takes two forms: `#[reflect(default)]` and `#[reflect(default = "some_func")]`. The former specifies that `Default::default()` should be used while the latter specifies that `some_func()` should be used. This is pretty much [how serde does it](https://serde.rs/field-attrs.html#default).

### Example

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
struct MyStruct {
  // Use `Default::default()`
  #[reflect(default)]
  foo: String,

  // Use `get_bar_default()`
  #[reflect(default = "get_bar_default")]
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

fn get_bar_default() -> usize {
  123
}
```

### Active Fields

As an added benefit, this also allows active fields to be completely missing from their dynamic object. This is because the attribute tells `FromReflect` how to handle missing active fields (it still tries to use `from_reflect` first so the `FromReflect` trait is still required).

```rust
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();

// We can do this without actually including the active fields since they have `#[reflect(default)]`
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

### Container Defaults

Also, with the addition of bevyengine#3733, people will likely start adding `#[reflect(Default)]` to their types now. Just like with the fields, we can use this to mark the entire container as "defaultable". This grants us the ability to completely remove the field markers altogether if our type implements `Default` (and we're okay with fields using that instead of their own `Default` impls):

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
#[reflect(Default)]
struct MyStruct {
  foo: String,
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

impl Default for MyStruct {
  fn default() -> Self {
    Self {
      foo: String::from("Hello"),
      bar: 123,
    }
  }
}

// Again, we can now construct this from nothing pretty much
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

Now if _any_ field is missing when using `FromReflect`, we simply fallback onto the container's `Default` implementation.

This behavior can be completely overridden on a per-field basis, of course, by simply defining those same field attributes like before.

### Related

* bevyengine#3733
* bevyengine#1395
* bevyengine#2377

---

## Changelog

* Added `#[reflect(default)]` field attribute for `FromReflect`
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value when using `FromReflect`
  * `#[reflect(default)]` - Use the field's `Default` implementation
  * `#[reflect(default = "some_fn")]` - Use a custom function to get the default value
* Allow `#[reflect(Default)]` to have a secondary usage as a container attribute
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value based on the container's `Default` impl when using `FromReflect`


Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
ItsDoot pushed a commit to ItsDoot/bevy that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
…bevyengine#3733)

### Problem
It currently isn't possible to construct the default value of a reflected type. Because of that, it isn't possible to use `add_component` of `ReflectComponent` to add a new component to an entity because you can't know what the initial value should be.

### Solution

1. add `ReflectDefault` type
```rust
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct ReflectDefault {
    default: fn() -> Box<dyn Reflect>,
}

impl ReflectDefault {
    pub fn default(&self) -> Box<dyn Reflect> {
        (self.default)()
    }
}

impl<T: Reflect + Default> FromType<T> for ReflectDefault {
    fn from_type() -> Self {
        ReflectDefault {
            default: || Box::new(T::default()),
        }
    }
}
```

2. add `#[reflect(Default)]` to all component types that implement `Default` and are user facing (so not `ComputedSize`, `CubemapVisibleEntities` etc.)



This makes it possible to add the default value of a component to an entity without any compile-time information:

```rust
fn main() {
    let mut app = App::new();
    app.register_type::<Camera>();

    let type_registry = app.world.get_resource::<TypeRegistry>().unwrap();
    let type_registry = type_registry.read();

    let camera_registration = type_registry.get(std::any::TypeId::of::<Camera>()).unwrap();
    let reflect_default = camera_registration.data::<ReflectDefault>().unwrap();
    let reflect_component = camera_registration
        .data::<ReflectComponent>()
        .unwrap()
        .clone();

    let default = reflect_default.default();

    drop(type_registry);

    let entity = app.world.spawn().id();
    reflect_component.add_component(&mut app.world, entity, &*default);

    let camera = app.world.entity(entity).get::<Camera>().unwrap();
    dbg!(&camera);
}
```

### Open questions
- should we have `ReflectDefault` or `ReflectFromWorld` or both?
ItsDoot pushed a commit to ItsDoot/bevy that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
…evyengine#4140)

# Objective

Currently, `FromReflect` makes a couple assumptions:

* Ignored fields must implement `Default`
* Active fields must implement `FromReflect`
* The reflected must be fully populated for active fields (can't use an empty `DynamicStruct`)

However, one or both of these requirements might be unachievable, such as for external types. In these cases, it might be nice to tell `FromReflect` to use a custom default.

## Solution

Added the `#[reflect(default)]` derive helper attribute. This attribute can be applied to any field (ignored or not) and will allow a default value to be specified in place of the regular `from_reflect()` call. 

It takes two forms: `#[reflect(default)]` and `#[reflect(default = "some_func")]`. The former specifies that `Default::default()` should be used while the latter specifies that `some_func()` should be used. This is pretty much [how serde does it](https://serde.rs/field-attrs.html#default).

### Example

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
struct MyStruct {
  // Use `Default::default()`
  #[reflect(default)]
  foo: String,

  // Use `get_bar_default()`
  #[reflect(default = "get_bar_default")]
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

fn get_bar_default() -> usize {
  123
}
```

### Active Fields

As an added benefit, this also allows active fields to be completely missing from their dynamic object. This is because the attribute tells `FromReflect` how to handle missing active fields (it still tries to use `from_reflect` first so the `FromReflect` trait is still required).

```rust
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();

// We can do this without actually including the active fields since they have `#[reflect(default)]`
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

### Container Defaults

Also, with the addition of bevyengine#3733, people will likely start adding `#[reflect(Default)]` to their types now. Just like with the fields, we can use this to mark the entire container as "defaultable". This grants us the ability to completely remove the field markers altogether if our type implements `Default` (and we're okay with fields using that instead of their own `Default` impls):

```rust
#[derive(Reflect, FromReflect)]
#[reflect(Default)]
struct MyStruct {
  foo: String,
  #[reflect(ignore)]
  bar: usize,
}

impl Default for MyStruct {
  fn default() -> Self {
    Self {
      foo: String::from("Hello"),
      bar: 123,
    }
  }
}

// Again, we can now construct this from nothing pretty much
let dyn_struct = DynamicStruct::default();
let my_struct = <MyStruct as FromReflect>::from_reflect(&dyn_struct);
```

Now if _any_ field is missing when using `FromReflect`, we simply fallback onto the container's `Default` implementation.

This behavior can be completely overridden on a per-field basis, of course, by simply defining those same field attributes like before.

### Related

* bevyengine#3733
* bevyengine#1395
* bevyengine#2377

---

## Changelog

* Added `#[reflect(default)]` field attribute for `FromReflect`
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value when using `FromReflect`
  * `#[reflect(default)]` - Use the field's `Default` implementation
  * `#[reflect(default = "some_fn")]` - Use a custom function to get the default value
* Allow `#[reflect(Default)]` to have a secondary usage as a container attribute
  * Allows missing fields to be given a default value based on the container's `Default` impl when using `FromReflect`


Co-authored-by: Gino Valente <49806985+MrGVSV@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Reflection Runtime information about types C-Enhancement A new feature
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants