Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

edition 2021 - tracking issue #2479

Closed
1 task done
mockersf opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed
1 task done

edition 2021 - tracking issue #2479

mockersf opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
C-Code-Quality A section of code that is hard to understand or change C-Tracking-Issue An issue that collects information about a broad development initiative S-Needs-Design This issue requires design work to think about how it would best be accomplished

Comments

@mockersf
Copy link
Member

mockersf commented Jul 14, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Things we can improve with edition 2021

I don't know if there will be many other things to do with edition 2021, but there's at least one that I don't want to forget so opening a tracking issue

Additions to the prelude

Default cargo feature resolver

IntoIterator for arrays

Disjoint capture in closure

Panic macro consistency

New reserved syntax

New cars errors

Or patterns in macro rules
@mockersf mockersf added C-Feature A new feature, making something new possible S-Needs-Triage This issue needs to be labelled labels Jul 14, 2021
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added C-Code-Quality A section of code that is hard to understand or change S-Needs-Design This issue requires design work to think about how it would best be accomplished A-Meta About the project itself C-Tracking-Issue An issue that collects information about a broad development initiative and removed C-Feature A new feature, making something new possible S-Needs-Triage This issue needs to be labelled A-Meta About the project itself labels Jul 15, 2021
@Ixentus Ixentus mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2021
Closed
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2021
@Ixentus
Remove wasm audio feature flag for 2021 (#3000)
771c5f5 
- Requires #2997 
- Removes `wasm_audio` feature as discussed in #2397
- Closes only task in #2479 

Open questions:
Should we enable wasm audio by default or only when building for wasm using `cfg`?
Maybe there should be a global wasm feature for bevy?
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2021
@Ixentus
Remove wasm audio feature flag for 2021 (#3000)
d98c2fe 
- Requires #2997 
- Removes `wasm_audio` feature as discussed in #2397
- Closes only task in #2479 

Open questions:
Should we enable wasm audio by default or only when building for wasm using `cfg`?
Maybe there should be a global wasm feature for bevy?
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2021
@Ixentus
Remove wasm audio feature flag for 2021 (#3000)
36394ad 
- Requires #2997 
- Removes `wasm_audio` feature as discussed in #2397
- Closes only task in #2479 

Open questions:
Should we enable wasm audio by default or only when building for wasm using `cfg`?
Maybe there should be a global wasm feature for bevy?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-Code-Quality A section of code that is hard to understand or change C-Tracking-Issue An issue that collects information about a broad development initiative S-Needs-Design This issue requires design work to think about how it would best be accomplished
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alice-i-cecile @mockersf