feat(avoidance): consider acceleration during avoidance maneuver

[satoshi-ota]

Description

🤖 Generated by Copilot at aa0a6c9

This pull request refactors and improves the avoidance logic of the behavior path planner. It simplifies the configuration file by removing two parameters and adding one for limiting lateral acceleration. It also removes unused code and updates the documentation accordingly.

Please approve ⬇️ before this PR.
autowarefoundation/autoware_launch#436

Tests performed

• PASS TIER IV INTERNAL SCENARIOS

Effects on system behavior

Make it possible to accelerate during avoidance maneuver.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 9.09% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (8c982e5) 14.16% compared to head (24f6bbb) 14.16%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4186   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   14.16%   14.16%           
=======================================
  Files        1586     1586           
  Lines      109537   109499   -38     
  Branches    31451    31429   -22     
=======================================
- Hits        15518    15515    -3     
+ Misses      77130    77102   -28     
+ Partials    16889    16882    -7     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	13.51% <9.09%> (?)
total	14.17% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 8c982e5

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...lanner/scene_module/avoidance/avoidance_module.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
..._planner/utils/avoidance/avoidance_module_data.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ath_planner/src/scene_module/avoidance/manager.cpp	7.42% <0.00%> (ø)
...lanner/include/obstacle_avoidance_planner/node.hpp	40.00% <ø> (ø)
...ng/obstacle_avoidance_planner/src/debug_marker.cpp	45.56% <ø> (ø)
planning/obstacle_avoidance_planner/src/node.cpp	40.41% <ø> (+0.17%)	⬆️
...cle_avoidance_planner/src/utils/geometry_utils.cpp	50.00% <ø> (ø)
...e_avoidance_planner/src/utils/trajectory_utils.cpp	44.82% <ø> (ø)
...er/src/scene_module/avoidance/avoidance_module.cpp	11.77% <10.52%> (+0.26%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[kyoichi-sugahara]

LGTM