feat(tier4_perception_launch): change the merge priority of roi_cluster_fusion to the lowest

[yukke42]

Signed-off-by: yukke42 yusuke.muramatsu@tier4.jp

Description

There are some objects which shape is estimated incorrectly by the roi_cluster_fusion pipeline, but this is the limitation of the algorithm becase of the lack of information, s.t. the orientation of objects. Therefore, the merge priority of roi_cluster_fusion changes to the lowest.

The screenshots below show the false detection from roi_cluster_fusion.
green: centerpoint
pink: roi_cluster_fusion

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 10.55% // Head: 10.57% // Increases project coverage by +0.01% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (590b403) compared to base (8bdfe7c).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 590b403 differs from pull request most recent head 89e1730. Consider uploading reports for the commit 89e1730 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2522      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   10.55%   10.57%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1268     1265       -3     
  Lines       87604    87439     -165     
  Branches    20931    20942      +11     
==========================================
- Hits         9246     9244       -2     
+ Misses      68495    68333     -162     
+ Partials     9863     9862       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	∅ <ø> (?)
total	10.57% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from c7d3b7d

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...planning_evaluator/src/planning_evaluator_node.cpp	34.37% <0.00%> (-2.09%)	⬇️
planning/behavior_path_planner/src/utilities.cpp	3.68% <0.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
...or_path_planner/src/behavior_path_planner_node.cpp	0.18% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
planning/obstacle_cruise_planner/src/node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
planning/obstacle_cruise_planner/src/utils.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
planning/static_centerline_optimizer/src/utils.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...erception/traffic_light_classifier/src/nodelet.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...nning/behavior_path_planner/src/path_utilities.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...tem/system_monitor/src/net_monitor/net_monitor.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...eption/map_based_prediction/src/path_generator.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 39 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[yukkysaito]

LGTM