Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not working for addons.thunderbird.net #111

Closed
PhoenixIV opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Not working for addons.thunderbird.net #111

PhoenixIV opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@PhoenixIV
Copy link

May you add support for Thunderbird xpi files?
Page: https://addons.thunderbird.net/

Rob--W added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2022
Support addons.thunderbird.net and addons-stage.thunderbird.net
Rob--W added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2022
- Rely on CORS instead of work-arounds for public XPI files from AMO (#92)
- Add work-around for crx access in Brave (#91)
- Support source viewing of extensions from Microsoft Edge (#95)
- Remove web_accessible_resourced to avoid UUID leak (#100)
- Correct 0-padding of hashes (#104)
- Update jsbeautifier to v1.14.0 (#110)
- Support source viewing of extensions from Thunderbird (#111)
- Fix domain front of AMO in Firefox add-on (#115)
- Recognize CRX3 files served by addons.opera.com (#118)
- Opera only: Add work-around to access addons.opera.com (#119)
- web only: Add crx keyword to input field for keyword search (#99)
- web only: Avoid breakage of web version when an extension runs a script (#113)
- Refactor: remove unsupported declarativeWebRequest path
- Refactor: Use declarative page actions to show button.
@Rob--W
Copy link
Owner

Rob--W commented Mar 28, 2022

I have added support for viewing the source code of Thunderbird extensions in 1.6.12.

@Rob--W Rob--W closed this as completed Mar 28, 2022
@PhoenixIV
Copy link
Author

Thanks!

Something I do not know about, but if no major rebuild is required you might also want to put this in the Thunderbird addon repository. Personally I am okay with switching to Firefox for inspection.

@Rob--W
Copy link
Owner

Rob--W commented Apr 1, 2022

I suggest to use the Firefox version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants