Fix multiline display equations in HTML #1518
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Ideas on the failing |
I think you end up with literal |
|
Oh, thanks. I though I recalled |
|
Tests passing. |
|
Thanks Morten. |
mortenpi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2021
(cherry picked from commit 93e253a)
Merged
odow
added a commit
to odow/Documenter.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2021
This is an identical bugfix fo JuliaDocs#1518, which was only applied to the HTML writer.
odow
added a commit
to odow/Documenter.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2021
This is an identical bugfix fo JuliaDocs#1518, which was only applied to the HTML writer.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This came from the JuMP docs: jump-dev/JuMP.jl#2447 (comment). We have some multiline display equations with
\nin them (e.g., to format arrays).Follows: #1426
Seems like it also fixes #1387
Is there a better way of testing this? I just followed #1426.