Add Deebot OZMO T8+ #639
Add Deebot OZMO T8+ #639
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new file, Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fqxoiu.py (1)
Line range hint
61-216: Code Duplication WarningThe capabilities defined for
fqxoiu.pyappear to be identical to those inx5d34r.py. Duplicating code can lead to maintenance challenges. Consider refactoring common capabilities into a base class or a shared configuration that both devices can inherit or utilize.This approach promotes reusability and simplifies future updates.
tests/hardware/test_init.py (1)
Line range hint
75-214: Extend Test Coverage for New DeviceThe
test_capabilities_event_extractionfunction currently tests several device classes but does not include"fqxoiu". To ensure comprehensive test coverage, consider adding a test case for"fqxoiu"that verifies its capabilities and associated commands.Example addition:
( "fqxoiu", { # Expected events and commands for 'fqxoiu' }, ),This ensures that any changes to the device's capabilities are properly tested.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fqxoiu.py(1 hunks)tests/hardware/test_init.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fqxoiu.py (2)
1-1:
File Name and Content Mismatch
The file name is fqxoiu.py, but the first line indicates x5d34r.py. This inconsistency can lead to confusion and potential issues in device identification. Please ensure that the file content matches the file name.
Apply this diff to correct the file content:
- x5d34r.py
+ fqxoiu.pyLikely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint 50-55: Verify Device Registration Key
In the device registration:
DEVICES[short_name(__name__)] = StaticDeviceInfo(
DataType.JSON,
Capabilities(
device_type=DeviceType.VACUUM,
availability=CapabilityEvent(
AvailabilityEvent, [GetBattery(is_available_check=True)]
),
# ...
),
)Ensure that short_name(__name__) correctly evaluates to "fqxoiu" to properly register the device. If __name__ reflects the module name incorrectly due to the file name mismatch, the device may not be registered as intended.
Run the following script to confirm the device is registered under the correct key:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the implementation of short_name function and check if the file name matches the expected pattern.
Let me check the content of fqxoiu.py to verify if it contains the device registration and also find the short_name implementation.
No issues with device registration key
The verification confirms that:
- The file
fqxoiu.pyexists at the correct location - The
short_namefunction correctly extracts the last part after the dot from__name__ - The device is properly registered using
DEVICES[short_name(__name__)]
The implementation is correct and will properly register the device under the key "fqxoiu" as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that 'fqxoiu' is correctly registered in DEVICES
# List all device keys and check for 'fqxoiu'
grep -r "DEVICES\[short_name(__name__)\]" deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ | awk -F'/' '{print $(NF)}' | sort
Length of output: 828
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of short_name function
ast-grep --pattern 'def short_name($_) { $$$ }'
# Also verify if fqxoiu.py exists and contains device registration
fd fqxoiu.py
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of fqxoiu.py for device registration
cat deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fqxoiu.py
# Find short_name implementation in the codebase
rg "def short_name" -A 2
Length of output: 7335
tests/hardware/test_init.py (1)
271-271: Ensure All Models Are Loaded Correctly
In the test_all_models_loaded function:
assert list(DEVICES) == [
# ...
"x5d34r",
"yna5xi",
"z4lvk7",
"zjavof",
"zwkcqc",
]The device "fqxoiu" is added to the list:
Ensure that this list accurately reflects all keys in the DEVICES dictionary. The order of devices in the assertion should match the order in which they are loaded. If fqxoiu is not correctly registered due to the file name mismatch, this test may fail.
Run the following script to verify that all models are correctly loaded and the test passes:
Ensure that there are no differences between the device lists.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output from the file listing, I can see that the device model "fqxoiu" exists in the codebase at deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fqxoiu.py. The file is properly placed in the expected location alongside other device model files. Let me verify the test assertion content:
The device model is correctly registered and matches the test assertion
Looking at the test file output, I can confirm that "fqxoiu" is properly included in the test_all_models_loaded assertion list and the device file exists at the correct location deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fqxoiu.py. The order in the assertion list is alphabetically sorted and "fqxoiu" appears in its correct position between "e6ofmn" and "guzput".
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that 'fqxoiu' exists in DEVICES and matches the test assertion.
# List all device keys from DEVICES
python -c 'from deebot_client.hardware.deebot import DEVICES; print(list(DEVICES.keys()))' > devices_list.txt
# Compare with the list in test_init.py
grep "assert list(DEVICES)" tests/hardware/test_init.py | sed 's/.*\[//; s/\]//; s/", "/\n/g; s/"//g' > test_devices_list.txt
# Diff the two lists
diff devices_list.txt test_devices_list.txt
Length of output: 346
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using grep and ripgrep to analyze the device lists
# First, let's find the DEVICES dictionary definition
rg -A 50 "DEVICES\s*=\s*{" deebot_client/hardware/
# Then find the test assertion
rg -A 20 "assert list\(DEVICES\)" tests/hardware/test_init.py
Length of output: 600
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and try again to find both the DEVICES definition and test assertion
# Find DEVICES dictionary definition
rg -A 50 "DEVICES = {" deebot_client/hardware/
# Also check if fqxoiu is defined in any hardware file
rg "fqxoiu" deebot_client/hardware/
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using fd to find relevant files first
# Find all Python files in hardware directory
fd -e py . deebot_client/hardware/
# Then use cat to examine their contents
fd -e py . deebot_client/hardware/ -x cat {}
# Also check for any model definition files
fd . deebot_client/hardware/models/
Length of output: 71345
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the test file to verify the assertion list
cat tests/hardware/test_init.py
Length of output: 10852
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #639 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.68% 86.68%
=======================================
Files 90 90
Lines 3365 3365
Branches 298 298
=======================================
Hits 2917 2917
Misses 394 394
Partials 54 54 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Add Deebot OZMO T8+, class 'fqxoiu'
Based on the Deebot OZMO T8 AIVI, class 'x5d34r', as per the existing T8+ class 55aiho
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes