Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Express Route Circuit Connection resource as a child of Express Route Circuit Peering in 2018-02-01 API #2358

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 30, 2018

Conversation

dedhar
Copy link
Contributor

@dedhar dedhar commented Jan 29, 2018

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@dsgouda dsgouda self-requested a review January 29, 2018 22:39
@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-python

@dedhar
Copy link
Contributor Author

dedhar commented Jan 29, 2018

@AutorestCI
Copy link

Did a commit to Azure/azure-sdk-for-go:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go@caeae5c

@AutorestCI
Copy link

Did a commit to Azure/azure-sdk-for-python:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python@caba431

Copy link
Contributor

@dsgouda dsgouda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix indentations. left a few minor comments. Overall looks good.

"type": "string",
"description": "The name of the peering."
},
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: indentation

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

"type": "string",
"description": "The name of the peering."
},
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: indentation

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

"description": "The name of the express route circuit connection."
},
{
"name": "expressroutecircuitconnectionParameters",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use camel casing here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -1219,6 +1394,13 @@
"ipv6PeeringConfig": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/Ipv6ExpressRouteCircuitPeeringConfig",
"description": "The IPv6 peering configuration."
},
"connections": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: indentation

@@ -1260,6 +1442,78 @@
}
},
"description": "Response for ListPeering API service call retrieves all peerings that belong to an ExpressRouteCircuit."
},
"ExpressRouteCircuitConnectionsPropertiesFormat": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: indentation

},
"description": "The Express Route Circuit Connections in an ExpressRoute Circuit Private Peering."
},
"nextLink": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mark this as readonly

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed that item since we are not supporting list operation on circuit connection as of yet

@dsgouda
Copy link
Contributor

dsgouda commented Jan 30, 2018

@DeepakRajendranMsft since this is a new api version PTAL

@dsgouda LGTM

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-python

@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

File: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 85
After the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 0

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback

Thanks for your co-operation.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-python

@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

File: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 85
After the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 0

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback

Thanks for your co-operation.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-python

@dedhar dedhar merged commit 814bcbf into Azure:Network-2018-02-01 Jan 30, 2018
@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-python

1 similar comment
@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-python

@AutorestCI
Copy link

This commit was treated and no generation was made for Azure/azure-sdk-for-go

dsgouda pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2018
… 2018 (#2642)

* Add support for Express Route Circuit Connection resource as a child of Express Route Circuit Peering in 2018-02-01 API (#2358)

* copy all files from 2018-01-01 to 2018-02-01

* update api version to 2018 in all files

* add express route circuit connection as child of express route bgp peering

* update readme.md

* add examples

* fix travis build error

* fix travis build error

* fix indentation errors

* update reference to circuit connections in peering

* fix indentation

* Merge Express Route Circuit Connection to Networking2018-02-01 (#2370)

* copy all files from 2018-01-01 to 2018-02-01

* update api version to 2018 in all files

* add express route circuit connection as child of express route bgp peering

* update readme.md

* add examples

* fix travis build error

* fix travis build error

* fix indentation errors

* update reference to circuit connections in peering

* fix indentation

* fix indentation

* fix indentation'

* get latest file

* Fix indentation

* fix key

* fix indentation and example

* fix indentation

* fix indentation

* make circuit con singular

* add fix as PR #2364 (#2376)

* Network feature: Setting custom ipsec policy for Virtual Network Gateway P2S clients. (#2521)

* 1443089: Network feature: Setting custom ipsec policy for Virtual Network Gateway P2S clients.

* 1443089:Fix network ReadMe file.

* 1443089:Fix network ReadMe file.

* Temporary bug fix

* Add support for Express Route Provider APIs (#2532)

* Add support for Express Route Provider APIs

A new top level NRP resource ExpressRouteCrossConnection is being
introduced with this change. This resource shadows the customer
ExpressRouteCircuit resouce in the customer subscription and enables
the     provider to perform CRUD operations on some of the
sub-resources, such as peerings on the ExpressRoute Circuit

* remove wrong enum values from circuit connection status and fix enum … (#2572)

* remove wrong enum values from circuit connection status and fix enum name

* Update ExpressRouteCrossConnection Route Table Summary Record (#2574)

* Update CrossConnection Route Table Summary record

* [Network-2018-02-01] DDoS Protection Plan resource (#2567)

* Initial version

* Add eol

* Add extra property in example

* Add default values for fields

* Rename operation IDs

* Make 'id' read-only for all network resources

* Revert "Make 'id' read-only for all network resources"

* Fix reference

* making peer express route circuit peering and express route circuit peering as references (#2696)

* Express Route Cross Connection Swagger changes as per PM requirements (#2644)

* Fixed operationIds for non-CRUD operations in ExpressRouteCrossConnections (#2720)

* Making travis run > 10 mins (#2739)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants