Hope to have an ordinary version number instead of '20140215'

[spacewander]

I suggest to use an ordinary version number like 'x.y.z' instead of using '20140215'.
Because:

1. using 'x.y.z' is more clear than '20140215', especially when we talk about the binary distribution.
2. since the current version of zeal is very different from one in Feb 15th, 2014.
3. using 'x.y.z', we can make the change log more clear, and more reasonable.

[PythonNut]

+1 for a semantic versioning scheme.

[henrikp]

I would like to see this as well.

[jkozera]

@spacewander not resolved - reopening

[spacewander]

@jkozera I am sorry... I should close it after asking others' advice. I am very sorry about my impertinence.

[jkozera]

@spacewander don't worry, we all make mistakes, and it's good to close outdated issues. :) If you want do discuss anything, or perhaps just chat in general, please come to #zealdocs @ freenode IRC, we have some discussion going on there.

[trollixx]

Fixed with 0.1.0 release.

[spacewander]

👍

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for a related request.