Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chocolatey Package with Zeal #236

Closed
cellx opened this issue Dec 6, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Chocolatey Package with Zeal #236

cellx opened this issue Dec 6, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@cellx
Copy link

cellx commented Dec 6, 2014

Hello Jerzy Kozera,

first I would like to congratulate for developing this Zeal with the inspiration of Dash. I prefer use it for offline docs.

So I support your application and just pack a package for Windows "apt-get"-Clone Chocolatey with the Zeal version 20140620.

You could find it on: https://chocolatey.org/packages/zeal

Please feel free to test it. For the installation on your Windows you should have installed the chocolatey tool, more information on https://chocolatey.org/

With the version number 20140620 I have to change it to 1.0.20140620. Which number it should have for the next versions? 1.0.20141126 (zeal-github-shippable-20141126054732.zip) or?

I will try to change my package with newer version in next days.

You could see my Chocolatey/Zeal repository on: https://github.com/cellx/chocolatey-packages

Any comments would be highly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Kilian

@jkozera
Copy link
Member

jkozera commented Dec 10, 2014

Thanks for making the package! 1.0.20141126 sounds reasonable, but in general I'd suggest using the version linked from http://zealdocs.org/download.html (20141123 currently) instead of the latest from https://bitbucket.org/jerzykozera/zeal-win32-binary-downloads/. The one from zealdocs.org should be more stable, because "shippable" builds from Bitbucket are going to be built automatically from latest sources.

@trollixx
Copy link
Member

trollixx commented Jan 9, 2015

I am closing this in favour of #203. We need a proper versioning and we'll have it soon.

@trollixx trollixx closed this as completed Jan 9, 2015
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Sep 17, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for a related request.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 17, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants