-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(#895, #1170) Refactor FallbackFrom and ScalarWithFallback #1525
(#895, #1170) Refactor FallbackFrom and ScalarWithFallback #1525
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1525 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 90.92% 90.89% -0.03%
- Complexity 1550 1553 +3
============================================
Files 281 281
Lines 3680 3680
Branches 127 127
============================================
- Hits 3346 3345 -1
Misses 304 304
- Partials 30 31 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@victornoel, look at this please. I haven't touched file src/main/java/org/cactoos/scalar/Solid.java. But Codecov/project said me there is a need to cover line 68 of Solid.java. WDYT ? |
I took the latest version of master before sending PR. |
Job #1525 is already in scope |
It seems to be OK now. |
Job |
@0crat status |
@victornoel, PR is still not in scope. Why ? |
@baudoliver7 because you closed it once |
@0crat in |
Ah, I see now. |
@0crat status |
@victornoel This is what I know about this job in C63314D6Z, as in §32:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@baudoliver7 are a few comments
@victornoel, I think that codecov/project checks give random results. I didn't add a new class or method but it said me code coverage level decreased. |
Please look at my last commits to get the point. |
@baudoliver7 yes, don't worry too much about codecov, if it's "almost" the target we will still merge it |
@rultor merge |
@baudoliver7 looks good, thx :) |
@victornoel OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here |
@victornoel Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 8min) |
@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @fabriciofx/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed |
Job was finished in 45 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36) |
@0crat quality bad |
@sereshqua Why quality is bad ? |
@baudoliver7 the reviewer -> @fabriciofx, he has not found ANY issues during code review this PR is not anyhow related to you :) |
@sereshqua, I understand now. |
Quality is low, no payment, see §31 |
#895, #1170