Add JSON Schema of extensions, TD minimal validation reference #373
Conversation
| <div data-include='directory.tm.json'></div> | ||
| </pre> | ||
| <pre class="advisement json" | ||
| data-include='directory.tm.json'></pre> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is change is to remove an extra line-break from the rendered output.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note that I in fact inlined this in the 3-wd publication.
| @@ -2033,16 +2033,20 @@ <h4>Listing</h4> | |||
|
|
|||
| </section> | |||
|
|
|||
| <section id="validation" class="normative"> | |||
| <section id="exploration-directory-api-things-validation" class="normative"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Modified left-over generic ID from when validation section was outside of TDD's API.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good catch, just make sure there are no duplicate ids introduced (including between sections and assertions, they are all in one namespace)
| @@ -2033,16 +2033,20 @@ <h4>Listing</h4> | |||
|
|
|||
| </section> | |||
|
|
|||
| <section id="validation" class="normative"> | |||
| <section id="exploration-directory-api-things-validation" class="normative"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good catch, just make sure there are no duplicate ids introduced (including between sections and assertions, they are all in one namespace)
| <div data-include='directory.tm.json'></div> | ||
| </pre> | ||
| <pre class="advisement json" | ||
| data-include='directory.tm.json'></pre> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note that I in fact inlined this in the 3-wd publication.
| It can be used for validating <a>TDs</a> by a <a>TDD</a> | ||
| as prescribed in [[[#exploration-directory-api-things-validation]]]. | ||
| <pre class="advisement json" | ||
| data-include='validation/td-discovery-extensions-json-schema.json'></pre> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
will be inlining this in the 3-wd version, data-include is not working sometimes.
|
So in general looks good, but I think we should update the assertion to explicitly allow either TD 1.0 or TD 1.1 versions. I am ok with merging if my suggested change is made. Also, this PR is against the main branch, but I would like to update the 3-wd version (the resolution we made last week in the main call allows for that). As part of doing that I will be inlining the data-include to make the file self-contained. |
update minimal validation assertion
Related to #371
Closes #99
Preview | Diff