changes for process 2021 style

[himorin]

• added w3cid for ones found
• changed html title as Change the title clreq#390

---

Preview | Diff

[himorin]

w3cid : The editors'/authors' names must be listed, with attribute data-editor-id="@@".
from https://www.w3.org/pubrules/doc/rules/?profile=WG-NOTE#editorSection

[r12a]

I believe that the id has to be present ONLY for those people who are likely to actually publish the document, rather than for all editors (which probably means just you and me). Do you know of any other reason for posting people's ids?

[himorin]

I totally have no idea on w3cid restriction...

[r12a]

I'll ask Denis for clarification.

[himorin]

discussed with @kidayasuo for a while,,, how about to move ones actively worked at the development of 2nd edition to authors?

[r12a]

Mm. Then we'd have the possibly tricky problem of deciding in some cases who is an author and who is an editor, unless everyone is added to the author list, and editors (defined as people who work on the HTML) are added to both lists.

I originally thought we could keep things simple by not adding unnecessary information to the source, but i fear that splitting the information would only increase the administrative work for us. Maybe it's best just to add everyone's w3cid, after all, and leave things as they are?? I don't imagine that we have to worry about anyone on the list unexpectedly publishing the document.

[kidayasuo]

@r12a I tend to agree. I do not like the idea of dividing people based on if they have w3cid. Can we change the document system if it mandates the w3cid that not necessarily all have? What is the benefit of the work of finding past editors' contact emails, writing them and asking a favour of creating a w3cid which was not necessary at the time they participated? They might not be reachable or they do not respond to the email quickly.

[r12a]

Let me check with the webmaster.

[himorin]

confirmed working with pubrules.
remaining errors are followings, both of which are duplicated between en and ja. So I'll add another commit to change ja one like with adding j at the last (e.g. d8e1224j)

• Duplicate ID “d8e1224”.
• Duplicate ID “d8e1230”.

[himorin]

requesting review with this. I confirm this could pass updated pubrules.

[kidayasuo]

Changes look good. thank you for updating the document, esp. working on getting w3cid.