Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose start and end buffered times #2501

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dmlap
Copy link
Member

@dmlap dmlap commented Aug 22, 2015

Requires videojs/video-js-swf#180. Pick up changes from the SWF that expose the start time of the current buffered region.

@pam
Copy link

pam commented Aug 22, 2015

Tests failed. Automated cross-browser testing via Sauce Labs and Travis CI shows that the JavaScript changes in this pull request are: BUSTED

Commit: 30266ec45a78d17c96f4f6b52ff59d2e27fb7a27
Build details: https://travis-ci.org/pam/video.js/builds/76806101

(Please note that this is a fully automated comment.)

@@ -264,7 +264,11 @@ class Flash extends Tech {
* @method buffered
*/
buffered() {
return createTimeRange(0, this.el_.vjs_getProperty('buffered'));
var ranges = this.el_.vjs_getProperty('buffered');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let?

@heff
Copy link
Member

heff commented Aug 25, 2015

lgtm

Requires videojs/video-js-swf#180. Pick up changes from the SWF that expose the start time of the current buffered region.
@pam
Copy link

pam commented Aug 25, 2015

Tests failed. Automated cross-browser testing via Sauce Labs and Travis CI shows that the JavaScript changes in this pull request are: BUSTED

Commit: 661132a
Build details: https://travis-ci.org/pam/video.js/builds/77216348

(Please note that this is a fully automated comment.)

@dmlap dmlap closed this in e95e3e7 Aug 31, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants