Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a valid arm-model to fake configuration #2192

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Add a valid arm-model to fake configuration #2192

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 11, 2023

Conversation

spieswl
Copy link

@spieswl spieswl commented Apr 10, 2023

When we modified the fake arm behavior, we updated this in several places but not the /etc config for checking out all fake components. This just adds an xArm6 as the faked arm model. Coincidentally, the errors emitted do indicate the underlying issue, but Eric didn't seem to follow what was happening. We might need to reevaluate that error message.

We could use model-path (I tested with this) but you have relative path resolution issues if you start the server from a different place, so I opted to keep this as simple as possible.

@spieswl spieswl requested a review from nfranczak April 10, 2023 18:24
@viambot viambot added the safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone label Apr 10, 2023
@edaniels
Copy link
Contributor

edaniels commented Apr 10, 2023

what about enforcing the fake model to always require a model and/or select a default one? Fakes should generally work with zero config.

@spieswl
Copy link
Author

spieswl commented Apr 10, 2023

When the related set of changes were coming through, we fielded a request that we make it so an empty config for a fake arm would not error out. We also wanted to provide the user with exactly what they had requested in this case, which was nothing, so in the absence of either attribute, we have set the fake to a NewSimpleModel that has zero DoF, geometries, and transforms.

Because the default NewSimpleModel has no frame information, you see the errors that arise when trying to use the RC card with an arm under the old fake.json. If we want the fake arm to be usable with zero configuration, we'll have to resurrect a model with non-zero DoF and set that instead of supplying the attribute or defaulting to the NewSimpleModel. I'll need to check in with stakeholders on this if we want that to be a hard line, since Product signed off on the change which led to this situation arising. @biotinker thoughts?

@biotinker
Copy link
Member

As soon as we implement the ability to display geometries in their proper locations and are able to visualize an arm via App, I think it will be more useful to have an arm in app that can actually do things; be it a ur5, an xarm6, or some set of connected joints without a real life analog. Looking at e.g. the fake Camera, it returns an autogenerated gradient image, not some external real-life image that was selected to be "the fake image".

Beyond our own internal testing, what's the use case for "I want a controllable imaginary arm, but I don't care what it actually looks like, how big it is, or how many degrees of freedom it has"?

@spieswl spieswl requested review from raybjork and biotinker April 11, 2023 21:00
Copy link
Member

@biotinker biotinker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@viambot viambot added safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone and removed safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone labels Apr 11, 2023
Copy link
Member

@biotinker biotinker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we default to a "real" arm, would prefer it not to be the one whose default position is at a singularity

@viambot viambot added safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone and removed safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone labels Apr 11, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Delta Health
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm 64% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/fake 30% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/universalrobots 40% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/wrapper 20% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/xarm 6% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/yahboom 6% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/audioinput 53% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base 61% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/agilex 62% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/boat 41% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/wheeled 76% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board 65% +0.15%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/arduino 10% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/fake 38% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/genericlinux 22% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/numato 19% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/pi 50% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera 64% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/align 64% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/fake 71% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/ffmpeg 77% +1.43%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/rtsp 44% +0.86%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/transformpipeline 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/videosource 34% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/encoder 15% -0.31%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/encoder/fake 76% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry 58% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry/multiaxis 85% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry/oneaxis 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/generic 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gripper 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/input 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/input/fake 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/input/gpio 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor 76% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/dimensionengineering 63% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/dmc4000 69% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/fake 56% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/gpio 66% +0.41%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/gpiostepper 52% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/tmcstepper 62% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/ulnstepper 52% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor 74% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/adxl345 66% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/cameramono 45% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/gpsnmea 36% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/gpsrtk 29% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/mpu6050 83% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/posetracker 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/sensor 66% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/sensor/ultrasonic 31% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/servo 66% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/servo/gpio 71% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/config 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/control 57% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/data 81% +3.94%
go.viam.com/rdk/examples/customresources/demos/remoteserver 0% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/grpc 25% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/ml 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/ml/inference 70% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/module 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/module/modmanager 80% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/motionplan 71% +0.10%
go.viam.com/rdk/operation 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/pointcloud 69% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/protoutils 49% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/referenceframe 72% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/registry 83% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/resource 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/depthadapter 94% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/transform 75% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/transform/cmd/extrinsic_calibration 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/client 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/framesystem 65% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/impl 81% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/packages 80% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/server 53% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/web 64% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/web/stream 87% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/baseremotecontrol 71% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/baseremotecontrol/builtin 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager 75% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/builtin 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/datacapture 73% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/datasync 0% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/mlmodel 83% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/motion 53% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/motion/builtin 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/navigation 54% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/sensors 74% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/sensors/builtin 97% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/shell 25% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam/builtin 74% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam/fake 90% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam/slam_copy/config 97% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam/slam_copy/dataprocess 71% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam/slam_copy/utils 100% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/vision 79% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/vision/builtin 74% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/session 97% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/spatialmath 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/subtype 92% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/utils 72% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision 26% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/chess 80% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/delaunay 87% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/keypoints 92% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/objectdetection 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/odometry 60% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/odometry/cmd 0% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/segmentation 49% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/web/server 26% 0.00%
Summary 65% (22916 / 35013) +0.03%

@spieswl spieswl requested a review from biotinker April 11, 2023 21:37
Copy link
Member

@biotinker biotinker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@spieswl spieswl merged commit 4cb49a2 into viamrobotics:main Apr 11, 2023
@spieswl spieswl deleted the add-arm-model-to-fake branch April 11, 2023 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants