tck test cluster

[HarrisChu]

What type of PR is this?

• bug
• feature
• [ x ] enhancement

What does this PR do?

enhance tck test framework, testing nebula cluster with 3 storaged.

Which issue(s)/PR(s) this PR relates to?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, etc:

Additional context:

Checklist：

• Documentation affected （Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
• Incompatible （If it is incompatible, please describe it and add corresponding label.）
• Need to cherry-pick （If need to cherry-pick to some branches, please label the destination version(s).)
• Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes：

Please confirm whether to reflect in release notes and how to describe:

                                                            `

[HarrisChu]

have done:

1. change default nebula cluster with 3 storaged, and then run original tck test cases.
2. fix some features running in 3 storaged.

to be continued:

1. migrate test cases for zone.
2. migrate job feature with a normal test feature?

[Shylock-Hg]

We should test single host and cluster together.

[HarrisChu]

We should test single host and cluster together.

yes, just set the default Nebula as a cluster, and can test a single host at the case level.
e.g.
Given a nebulacluster with 1 graphd and 1 metad and 1 storaged

[HarrisChu]

inspired by #3252

[yixinglu]

Great starting point for cluster testing.

[HarrisChu]

cannot start nebula in SSL model, will check later

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3266 (e1514be) into master (fe68b0e) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 75.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3266      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.27%   85.23%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        1276     1276              
  Lines      118999   119004       +5     
==========================================
- Hits       101475   101434      -41     
- Misses      17524    17570      +46     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/common/expression/ContainerExpression.cpp	90.00% <66.66%> (-2.13%)	⬇️
src/graph/validator/test/YieldValidatorTest.cpp	91.78% <100.00%> (ø)
src/parser/test/ParserTest.cpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/meta/processors/parts/GetSpaceProcessor.cpp	60.60% <0.00%> (-18.19%)	⬇️
src/meta/processors/BaseProcessor.h	75.67% <0.00%> (-16.22%)	⬇️
src/graph/context/Result.cpp	85.00% <0.00%> (-9.45%)	⬇️
src/common/thrift/ThriftClientManager-inl.h	82.97% <0.00%> (-6.39%)	⬇️
...eta/processors/session/SessionManagerProcessor.cpp	74.19% <0.00%> (-4.52%)	⬇️
src/graph/executor/StorageAccessExecutor.h	66.66% <0.00%> (-2.57%)	⬇️
src/storage/mutate/AddVerticesProcessor.cpp	85.64% <0.00%> (-2.40%)	⬇️
... and 22 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8872973...e1514be. Read the comment docs.

[yixinglu]

LGTM