License jest-zone-patch under MIT #331
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background:
jest-zone-patchwas imported into this repository, as it seemed to only be used as transitive dependency ofjest-preset-angular(thymikee/jest-zone-patch#9 (comment))As discussed in #214, we would like all contributers of
jest-zone-patchto agree for thejest-zone-patch-code to adopt the MIT license instead of the previous BSD-3 license.Removing the second license from this repository will reduce confusion and complexity, I am also not sure if the second license is picked up by license collectors when bundling, or by dependency-license-checkers.
I am not sure if this procedure is required, but it is still nice to inform and ask the contributers.
A further step could be to archive
jest-zone-patch.