Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Report] Check virtual-log-view vs. log-view vs. AbstractLogView #245

Closed
Zsar opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

[Report] Check virtual-log-view vs. log-view vs. AbstractLogView #245

Zsar opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ReportNG Bugs and enhancements concerning Testerra ReportNG

Comments

@Zsar
Copy link

Zsar commented Jun 23, 2022

@Zsar Zsar added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 23, 2022
@Zsar Zsar self-assigned this Jun 23, 2022
@Zsar Zsar linked a pull request Jun 23, 2022 that will close this issue
12 tasks
@martingrossmann martingrossmann changed the title Check virtual-log-view vs. log-view vs. AbstractLogView [Report] Check virtual-log-view vs. log-view vs. AbstractLogView Jun 23, 2022
@martingrossmann martingrossmann added this to the 2.1 milestone Jun 24, 2022
@martingrossmann martingrossmann added the ReportNG Bugs and enhancements concerning Testerra ReportNG label Sep 15, 2022
@mreiche
Copy link
Collaborator

mreiche commented Sep 20, 2022

The virtual log view is designed for "infinite" logs with a fixed size and a scrolling container inside. The log view is designed to resize and show its full content.

@martingrossmann martingrossmann removed this from the 2.1 milestone Sep 21, 2022
@Zsar Zsar removed their assignment Dec 9, 2022
@martingrossmann
Copy link
Contributor

martingrossmann commented Jan 10, 2024

From my point this issue is no longer relevant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ReportNG Bugs and enhancements concerning Testerra ReportNG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants