Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

React: Bundle in lodash #28609

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

React: Bundle in lodash #28609

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

ndelangen
Copy link
Member

@ndelangen ndelangen commented Jul 15, 2024

What I did

Hopefully this fixes the problem discribed in this comment:
#28607 (comment)

Checklist for Contributors

Testing

The changes in this PR are covered in the following automated tests:

  • stories
  • unit tests
  • integration tests
  • end-to-end tests

Manual testing

This section is mandatory for all contributions. If you believe no manual test is necessary, please state so explicitly. Thanks!

Documentation

  • Add or update documentation reflecting your changes
  • If you are deprecating/removing a feature, make sure to update
    MIGRATION.MD

Checklist for Maintainers

  • When this PR is ready for testing, make sure to add ci:normal, ci:merged or ci:daily GH label to it to run a specific set of sandboxes. The particular set of sandboxes can be found in code/lib/cli/src/sandbox-templates.ts

  • Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below:

    Available labels
    • bug: Internal changes that fixes incorrect behavior.
    • maintenance: User-facing maintenance tasks.
    • dependencies: Upgrading (sometimes downgrading) dependencies.
    • build: Internal-facing build tooling & test updates. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • cleanup: Minor cleanup style change. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • documentation: Documentation only changes. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • feature request: Introducing a new feature.
    • BREAKING CHANGE: Changes that break compatibility in some way with current major version.
    • other: Changes that don't fit in the above categories.

🦋 Canary release

This pull request has been released as version 0.0.0-pr-28609-sha-1103d7ff. Try it out in a new sandbox by running npx storybook@0.0.0-pr-28609-sha-1103d7ff sandbox or in an existing project with npx storybook@0.0.0-pr-28609-sha-1103d7ff upgrade.

More information
Published version 0.0.0-pr-28609-sha-1103d7ff
Triggered by @ndelangen
Repository storybookjs/storybook
Branch norbert/bundle-in-lodash
Commit 1103d7ff
Datetime Mon Jul 15 15:30:20 UTC 2024 (1721057420)
Workflow run 9942248326

To request a new release of this pull request, mention the @storybookjs/core team.

core team members can create a new canary release here or locally with gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook canary-release-pr.yml --field pr=28609

name before after diff z %
createSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
generateSize 76.3 MB 76.3 MB 0 B -1.35 0%
initSize 198 MB 198 MB 10.4 kB -0.52 0%
diffSize 122 MB 122 MB 10.4 kB 3.22 0%
buildSize 7.61 MB 7.61 MB 2.53 kB 3.09 0%
buildSbAddonsSize 1.64 MB 1.64 MB 0 B 2.38 0%
buildSbCommonSize 195 kB 195 kB 0 B - 0%
buildSbManagerSize 2.3 MB 2.3 MB 0 B 2.38 0%
buildSbPreviewSize 351 kB 351 kB 0 B 2.37 0%
buildStaticSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
buildPrebuildSize 4.48 MB 4.48 MB 0 B 2.38 0%
buildPreviewSize 3.12 MB 3.13 MB 2.53 kB 5.94 0.1%
testBuildSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbAddonsSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbCommonSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbManagerSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbPreviewSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildStaticSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildPrebuildSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildPreviewSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
name before after diff z %
createTime 7s 6.9s -103ms -1.11 -1.5%
generateTime 21s 22.5s 1.5s -0.25 6.6%
initTime 21.8s 22.5s 734ms -0.66 3.3%
buildTime 13.3s 13.4s 58ms -0.64 0.4%
testBuildTime 0ms 0ms 0ms - -
devPreviewResponsive 8.4s 7.4s -953ms -0.78 -12.7%
devManagerResponsive 5.3s 5s -302ms -0.79 -6%
devManagerHeaderVisible 871ms 692ms -179ms -1.09 -25.9%
devManagerIndexVisible 907ms 725ms -182ms -1.08 -25.1%
devStoryVisibleUncached 1.4s 1.4s -28ms -0.03 -2%
devStoryVisible 929ms 746ms -183ms -1.09 -24.5%
devAutodocsVisible 855ms 639ms -216ms -1.25 🔰-33.8%
devMDXVisible 750ms 687ms -63ms -1.2 -9.2%
buildManagerHeaderVisible 751ms 662ms -89ms -1.56 🔰-13.4%
buildManagerIndexVisible 756ms 667ms -89ms -1.56 🔰-13.3%
buildStoryVisible 807ms 709ms -98ms -1.6 🔰-13.8%
buildAutodocsVisible 700ms 607ms -93ms -1.56 🔰-15.3%
buildMDXVisible 673ms 585ms -88ms -1.41 🔰-15%

@ndelangen ndelangen self-assigned this Jul 15, 2024
@ndelangen ndelangen added maintenance User-facing maintenance tasks vue3 ci:normal labels Jul 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Summary

  • Moved 'lodash' from 'dependencies' to 'devDependencies' in code/renderers/vue3/package.json
  • Ensures 'lodash' is only used during development
  • Potentially reduces final production bundle size
  • Aims to resolve issue mentioned in linked comment

1 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings

@ndelangen ndelangen changed the title Maintenance: Bundle in lodash Maintenance: Bundle in lodash Jul 15, 2024
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jul 15, 2024

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 55f141a. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 2 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@valentinpalkovic
Copy link
Contributor

I just looked at how often we are using lodash, and I think if we start to bundle all of them, it would potentially lead to an explosive increase in bundle size.

Let's do this to fix it temporarily, but let's figure out a smaller replacement for lodash in the near future.

I guess we want to prebundle lodash then also in

  • renderers/react
  • lib/source-loader
  • lib/codemod
  • lib/blocks
  • addons/controls
  • addons/a11y

@ndelangen WDYT?

@valentinpalkovic
Copy link
Contributor

@ndelangen Should we use https://github.com/you-dont-need/You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore?tab=readme-ov-file#eslint-plugin to replace unnecessary usages of lodash and potentially get entirely rid of it?

@ndelangen
Copy link
Member Author

ndelangen commented Jul 15, 2024

In this PR I do both renderers, cause that seemed to make sense.

I'm considering blocks and addon-controls as well..
But as the issue suggests an issue in renderers, those are the only ones I did.
Because as you suggest, bundle size is a concern!

The other packages are only run in node AFAIK, and always in CJS, so those don't have to be changed?

I think if we start to bundle all of them, it would potentially lead to an explosive increase in bundle size.

Yes, that's a valid concern! Though it should be able to tree-shake to only the parts of lodash we actually use.
Also, we don't have to guess about the impact; the benchmarking will tell us! 🎉

I'm definitely interested in removing all references to lodash as well.

@ndelangen ndelangen merged commit 01b5df5 into next Aug 6, 2024
53 checks passed
@ndelangen ndelangen deleted the norbert/bundle-in-lodash branch August 6, 2024 07:40
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2024
29 tasks
@shilman shilman changed the title Maintenance: Bundle in lodash React: Bundle in lodash Aug 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci:normal maintenance User-facing maintenance tasks vue3
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants