Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document that Spring Boot will auto-configure RestClient.Builder beans with the observation registry #33857

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

quaff
Copy link
Contributor

@quaff quaff commented Nov 8, 2024

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on label Nov 8, 2024
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Nov 10, 2024

Thanks for the suggestion but if this needs to be described, it should be in the Spring Boot reference doc.

@snicoll snicoll closed this Nov 10, 2024
@snicoll snicoll added status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Nov 10, 2024
quaff added a commit to quaff/spring-framework that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
…gistry" from document

>> it should be in the Spring Boot reference doc.

See spring-projects#33857 (comment)
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Nov 11, 2024

@bclozel see the above for context. I am reopening to get some more feedback as they are other places within our ref doc that have such references.

@snicoll snicoll reopened this Nov 11, 2024
@snicoll snicoll added status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on and removed status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply labels Nov 11, 2024
@bclozel
Copy link
Member

bclozel commented Nov 22, 2024

While we always work towards consistency, I find this PR very frustrating to deal with. The former sentence came from an actual discussion with a library maintainer in #29904. I don't think dedicating our time to discussing this is time well spent.

@bclozel bclozel closed this Nov 22, 2024
@bclozel bclozel added status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Nov 22, 2024
@quaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

quaff commented Nov 22, 2024

One of this PR and #33866 should be merged to keep consistency. @bclozel

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants