Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix semver hazard in S3 stalled stream protection test #3541

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2024

Conversation

jdisanti
Copy link
Collaborator

Merging #3485 uncovered a semver hazard in the S3 stalled stream protection test due to a subtle (but intentional) change in grace period behavior for stalled streams. That semver hazard was going to cause the SDK release to fail, so #3485 was reverted, and this PR modifies the test so that it will pass with both versions of stalled stream protection as a temporary measure. Once this PR is merged and released, then the new stalled stream protection can be merged again.

I tested this by updating the runtime-versioner in #3540 so that I could patch the currently released SDK with these test changes in place, with a local copy of smithy-rs that has the new stalled stream protection implementation. I ran all the tests across all the services in this configuration to verify this was the only hazard that will be hit.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view.

  • AWS SDK (ignoring whitespace)
  • No codegen difference in the Client Test
  • No codegen difference in the Server Test
  • No codegen difference in the Server Test Python
  • No codegen difference in the Server Test Typescript

A new doc preview is ready to view.

@rcoh rcoh added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8af3449 Mar 30, 2024
42 checks passed
@rcoh rcoh deleted the jdisanti-fix-ssp-test-semver branch March 30, 2024 02:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants