Cosmetics #9
Merged
Cosmetics #9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
as revision date instead of LaTeX compilation date
Kenny2github
force-pushed
the
cosmetics
branch
from
3d9b867
to
345fcd5
Compare
|
Removed commits regarding XeLaTeX detritus - that problem is resolved by #10 instead which should be merged first |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One change here is not truly cosmetic and is up to debate, specifically b85dd08 since it actually changes the true PDF content. Without it, these changes will result in PDFs that all say the same date.