Add AGI & CoCoSci

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

https://github.com/YuzheSHI/awesome-agi-cocosci/#readme

I add AGI & CoCoSci to Awesome to fill-in its absence of academic resources on artificial general intelligence and computational cognitive sciences.

• AGI & CoCoSci provides users with following resources:
  • Classic and cutting-edge research papers and books categorized in diverse intelligent phenomena, with direct links and links to Google Scholar All Versions, some of which also include links to codes and project websites;
  • Established institutes and researchers on related topics;
  • Eminent scientists and thinkers on related topics with their historical representative books;
  • BibTex templates for composing papers with latex on related topics.

Artificial General Intelligence an emerging inter-discipline field that combines artificial intelligence and computational cognitive sciences as majority, alone with probability and mathematical statistics, formal logic, cognitive and developmental psychology, computational philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, and computational sociology. We are promoting high-level machine intelligence by getting inspirations from the way that human learns and thinks, while obtaining a deeper understanding of human cognition simultaneously. We believe that this kind of reciprocative research is a potential way towards our big picture: building intelligent agents with the capacity to handle human-level tasks such as abstracting, explaining, learning, planning, and making decisions.

By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements 🖖

Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.

Requirements for your pull request

• Don't waste my time. Do a good job, adhere to all the guidelines, and be responsive.
• You have to review at least 2 other open pull requests.
  Try to prioritize unreviewed PRs, but you can also add more comments to reviewed PRs. Go through the below list when reviewing. This requirement is meant to help make the Awesome project self-sustaining. Comment here which PRs you reviewed. You're expected to put a good effort into this and to be thorough. Look at previous PR reviews for inspiration. Just commenting “looks good” or simply marking the pull request as approved does not count! You have to actually point out mistakes or improvement suggestions.
• You have read and understood the instructions for creating a list.
• This pull request has a title in the format Add Name of List.
  • ✅ Add Swift
  • ✅ Add Software Architecture
  • ❌ Update readme.md
  • ❌ Add Awesome Swift
  • ❌ Add swift
  • ❌ add Swift
  • ❌ Adding Swift
  • ❌ Added Swift
• Your entry here should include a short description about the project/theme of the list. It should not describe the list itself. The first character should be uppercase and the description should end in a dot. It should be an objective description and not a tagline or marketing blurb.
  • ✅ - [iOS](…) - Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
  • ✅ - [Framer](…) - Prototyping interactive UI designs.
  • ❌ - [iOS](…) - Resources and tools for iOS development.
  • ❌ - [Framer](…)
  • ❌ - [Framer](…) - prototyping interactive UI designs
• Your entry should be added at the bottom of the appropriate category.
• The title of your entry should be title-cased and the URL to your list should end in #readme.
  • Example: - [Software Architecture](https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture#readme) - The discipline of designing and building software.
• The suggested Awesome list complies with the below requirements.

Requirements for your Awesome list

• Has been around for at least 30 days.
  That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
• Don't open a Draft / WIP pull request while you work on the guidelines. A pull request should be 100% ready and should adhere to all the guidelines when you open it.
• Run awesome-lint on your list and fix the reported issues. If there are false-positives or things that cannot/shouldn't be fixed, please report it.
• The default branch should be named main, not master.
• Includes a succinct description of the project/theme at the top of the readme. (Example)
  • ✅ Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
  • ✅ Prototyping interactive UI designs.
  • ❌ Resources and tools for iOS development.
  • ❌ Awesome Framer packages and tools.
• It's the result of hard work and the best I could possibly produce.
  If you have not put in considerable effort into your list, your pull request will be immediately closed.
• The repo name of your list should be in lowercase slug format: awesome-name-of-list.
  • ✅ awesome-swift
  • ✅ awesome-web-typography
  • ❌ awesome-Swift
  • ❌ AwesomeWebTypography
• The heading title of your list should be in title case format: # Awesome Name of List.
  • ✅ # Awesome Swift
  • ✅ # Awesome Web Typography
  • ❌ # awesome-swift
  • ❌ # AwesomeSwift
• Non-generated Markdown file in a GitHub repo.
• The repo should have awesome-list & awesome as GitHub topics. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.
• Not a duplicate. Please search for existing submissions.
• Only has awesome items. Awesome lists are curations of the best, not everything.
• Does not contain items that are unmaintained, has archived repo, deprecated, or missing docs. If you really need to include such items, they should be in a separate Markdown file.
• Includes a project logo/illustration whenever possible.
  • Either centered, fullwidth, or placed at the top-right of the readme. (Example)
  • The image should link to the project website or any relevant website.
  • The image should be high-DPI. Set it to maximum half the width of the original image.
• Entries have a description, unless the title is descriptive enough by itself. It rarely is though.
• Includes the Awesome badge.
  • Should be placed on the right side of the readme heading.
    • Can be placed centered if the list has a centered graphics header.
  • Should link back to this list.
• Has a Table of Contents section.
  • Should be named Contents, not Table of Contents.
  • Should be the first section in the list.
  • Should only have one level of nested lists, preferably none.
  • Must not feature Contributing or Footnotes sections.
• Has an appropriate license.
  • We strongly recommend the CC0 license, but any Creative Commons license will work.
    • Tip: You can quickly add it to your repo by going to this URL: https://github.com/<user>/<repo>/community/license/new?branch=main&template=cc0-1.0 (replace <user> and <repo> accordingly).
  • A code license like MIT, BSD, Apache, GPL, etc, is not acceptable. Neither are WTFPL and Unlicense.
  • Place a file named license or LICENSE in the repo root with the license text.
  • Do not add the license name, text, or a Licence section to the readme. GitHub already shows the license name and link to the full text at the top of the repo.
  • To verify that you've read all the guidelines, please comment on your pull request with just the word unicorn.
• Has contribution guidelines.
  • The file should be named contributing.md. Casing is up to you.
  • It can optionally be linked from the readme in a dedicated section titled Contributing, positioned at the top or bottom of the main content.
  • The section should not appear in the Table of Contents.
• All non-important but necessary content (like extra copyright notices, hyperlinks to sources, pointers to expansive content, etc) should be grouped in a Footnotes section at the bottom of the readme. The section should not be present in the Table of Contents.
• Has consistent formatting and proper spelling/grammar.
  • The link and description are separated by a dash.
    Example: - [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.
  • The description starts with an uppercase character and ends with a period.
  • Consistent and correct naming. For example, Node.js, not NodeJS or node.js.
• Doesn't use hard-wrapping.
• Doesn't include a Travis badge.
  You can still use Travis for list linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
• Doesn't include an Inspired by awesome-foo or Inspired by the Awesome project kinda link at the top of the readme. The Awesome badge is enough.

Go to the top and read it again.

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

I have reviewed #2079 and #2084

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

unicorn

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

Sorry for committing so many checks to hack some unexpected bugs :).

[michelpereira]

Why you cannot merge your new list with https://github.com/owainlewis/awesome-artificial-intelligence#readme ?

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

Why you cannot merge your new list with https://github.com/owainlewis/awesome-artificial-intelligence#readme ?

Good question. Essentially, AI and CoCoSci lie in different research methodologies, representing two mainstream beliefs of pursuing the sciences of intelligence. The former is objective-driven---if we build machines, regardless of their computational basis, that learn to solve all the tasks from data and knowledge, then we implement artificial general intelligence. The latter is reverse-engineering-driven---if we understand the nature of human intelligence and computationally model it, we find the way to achieve artificial general intelligence. It is hard to say which team would reach the peak first, but they are not really the same.

[sindresorhus]

I think the people mentioned in People & Book should have a one-liner bio for people not familiar with them.

[sindresorhus]

I would also have liked to see a short summary for each paper. I do realize that's a ton of work, so it's not a requirement, but I think it would make the list more approachable.

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

@sindresorhus Thank you for the comments. I will append bioes in People & Book, and add summaries for significant ones in the papers.

[sindresorhus]

Bump

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

Bump

?

[sindresorhus]

Is my feedback addressed?

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

Is my feedback addressed?

Yes. I have added bioes for People & Book and brief introes for significant papers and resources.

[sindresorhus]

Ok. You need to resolve the merge conflict.

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

Ok. You need to resolve the merge conflict.

I'm applying force pushing to this PR. But this would remove all the previous comments. Is this acceptable?

[benjaminsehl]

The cleanest thing for you to do at this point would be to close the PR, create a new branch, and request a new PR.

[sindresorhus]

I'm applying force pushing to this PR. But this would remove all the previous comments. Is this acceptable?

Yes. And it will not remove the comments.

[sindresorhus]

The cleanest thing for you to do at this point would be to close the PR, create a new branch, and request a new PR.

@benjaminsehl No. That is wrong. There's never a reason to do that. You can always fix the branch locally and force push to the existing remote branch. Opening a new PR just creates noise in the issue tracker.

[benjaminsehl]

The cleanest thing for you to do at this point would be to close the PR, create a new branch, and request a new PR.

@benjaminsehl No. That is wrong. There's never a reason to do that. You can always fix the branch locally and force push to the existing remote branch. Opening a new PR just creates noise in the issue tracker.

Your call, of course! Given the PR was several months old, and it's just a single file, it seemed simpler to me.

[SHI-Yu-Zhe]

@sindresorhus I tried force pushing to my upstream branch patch-1, but was always getting the Permission denied error as long as the origin is sindresorhus/awesome.git. According to my knowledge about GitHub, this should not happen. Could you please figure out what was happening?

[sindresorhus]

Closing in favor of #2320