Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DOC Update percentages for eagerloading benchmark #458

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

DOC Update percentages for eagerloading benchmark #458

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions en/04_Changelogs/5.1.0.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -146,10 +146,10 @@ foreach ($teams as $team) {

In a test setup with looping through 100 DataObjects each with 100 related DataObjects for a total of 10,000 records per test run, the following performance improvements were observed for different types of relations (eager-loading vs not eager-loading):

- HasOne - 3227% faster (0.0078s vs 0.2595s)
- HasMany - 25% faster (0.1453s vs 0.1819s)
- ManyMany - 25% faster (0.1664s vs 0.2083s)
- ManyManyThrough - 16% faster (0.6586s vs 0.7681s)
- HasOne - ~97% faster (0.0078s vs 0.2595s)
- HasMany - ~20% faster (0.1453s vs 0.1819s)
- ManyMany - ~20% faster (0.1664s vs 0.2083s)
- ManyManyThrough - ~14% faster (0.6586s vs 0.7681s)

Note that those observations were made using MySQL.

Expand Down
Loading