Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLASS_SHOULD_NOT_BE_ABSTRACT: abstract fields are ignored #1100

Closed
orchestr7 opened this issue Nov 8, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1102
Closed

CLASS_SHOULD_NOT_BE_ABSTRACT: abstract fields are ignored #1100

orchestr7 opened this issue Nov 8, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1102
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@orchestr7
Copy link
Member

abstract class BaseUsesProcessor() {
    // Store uses by file
    abstract val a: String
    
    fun foo() {}
}

is incorrectly treated as NON abstract class

@orchestr7 orchestr7 added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 8, 2021
@orchestr7 orchestr7 changed the title CLASS_SHOULD_NOT_BE_ABSTRACT: CLASS_SHOULD_NOT_BE_ABSTRACT: abstract fields are ignored Nov 8, 2021
petertrr added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2021
)

### What's done:
* Fix logic
* Add tests

Closes #1100
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants