Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add note about non_exhaustive to variant_count #92568

Merged

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Since variant_count isn't returning something opaque, I thought it makes sense to explicitly call out that its return value may change for some enums.

cc #73662

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @kennytm

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 5, 2022
@the8472
Copy link
Member

the8472 commented Jan 5, 2022

LGTM.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2022

📌 Commit 57b59af has been approved by the8472

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 5, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
…ant-count, r=the8472

Add note about non_exhaustive to variant_count

Since `variant_count` isn't returning something opaque, I thought it makes sense to explicitly call out that its return value may change for some enums.

cc rust-lang#73662
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
…ant-count, r=the8472

Add note about non_exhaustive to variant_count

Since `variant_count` isn't returning something opaque, I thought it makes sense to explicitly call out that its return value may change for some enums.

cc rust-lang#73662
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2022
…ant-count, r=the8472

Add note about non_exhaustive to variant_count

Since `variant_count` isn't returning something opaque, I thought it makes sense to explicitly call out that its return value may change for some enums.

cc rust-lang#73662
@ehuss ehuss mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2022
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#84640 (Implement `TryFrom<char>` for `u8`)
 - rust-lang#92336 (Remove &self from PrintState::to_string)
 - rust-lang#92375 (Consolidate checking for msvc when generating debuginfo)
 - rust-lang#92568 (Add note about non_exhaustive to variant_count)
 - rust-lang#92600 (Add some missing `#[must_use]` to some `f{32,64}` operations)
 - rust-lang#92610 (Create CSS class instead of using inline style for search results)
 - rust-lang#92632 (Implement stabilization of `#[feature(available_parallelism)]`)
 - rust-lang#92650 (Fix typo in `StableCrateId` docs)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0bd7e2f into rust-lang:master Jan 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Jan 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants