-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #90178
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #90178
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* dirs-sys v0.3.4 -> v0.3.6 to drop a lot of deps regex v1.3.1 -> v1.4.3 drops thread_local 0.3.6 bytecount v0.6.0 -> v0.6.2 replaces packed_simd with packed_simd_2 ignore v0.4.11 -> v0.4.17 drop crossbeam-channel v0.4.0 * itertools 8.0 -> 9.0 bump `ignore` version in Cargo.toml * cargo_metadata 0.8 -> 0.12 * env_logger 0.6 -> 0.8
Since RFC 3052 soft deprecated the authors field anyway, hiding it from crates.io, docs.rs, and making Cargo not add it by default, and it is not generally up to date/useful information, we should remove it from crates in this repo.
rfc3052 followup: Remove authors field from Cargo manifests Since RFC 3052 soft deprecated the authors field, hiding it from crates.io, docs.rs, and making Cargo not add it by default, and it is not generally up to date/useful information for contributors, we may as well remove it from crates in this repo.
This is possible now that rustdoc allows passing `--document-private-items` more than once.
…mulacrum Document private items for rustfmt This is possible now that rust-lang#73936 has been merged.
A demonstration of the fix is included in the PR associated with this commit.
See https://gushiermainecoon.htmlpasta.com/ for a demo of this change. Part of rust-lang#4178
Separates out search and direct linking, uses header ids for direct linking and `?search=term` for filtering configurations. Once the app mounts the page is scrolled to the current header set in the url hash.
* Adds query param for version no This adds support for using a query parameter for selecting the version no * Adds error handling to configuration request Catch request exception in case fetching the configuration from the url fails, this can happen either if non existent version number is passed in or because of server issues. * Makes version selection better Covers a few common cases in which the version number can be specified.
- Preserve search and version parameter updates in the url - Render headings with an anchor to itself for easier linking to config options, variants, etc. Demo: https://5efeb81ca3f0d.htmlsave.net/
I broke this a few weeks ago so I'll fix it Demo: https://5f0fa445faca4aff5f580029--naughty-borg-09b903.netlify.app/?version=master&search=#brace_style
Older tags of the repo don't have the configuration.md file that the docs/index.html file uses to display configuration options. Removing them from the list since they don't apply to the use case of the documentation page.
Signed-off-by: gunadhya <6939749+gunadhya@users.noreply.github.com>
This addresses a TODO comment. The behavior of #[derive(Clone)] *does* result in a T: Clone requirement. Add a manual Clone implementation, matching Split and SplitInclusive.
Implement split_array and split_array_mut This implements `[T]::split_array::<const N>() -> (&[T; N], &[T])` and `[T; N]::split_array::<const M>() -> (&[T; M], &[T])` and their mutable equivalents. These are another few “missing” array implementations now that const generics are a thing, similar to rust-lang#74373, rust-lang#75026, etc. Fixes rust-lang#74674. This implements `[T; N]::split_array` returning an array and a slice. Ultimately, this is probably not what we want, we would want the second return value to be an array of length N-M, which will likely be possible with future const generics enhancements. We need to implement the array method now though, to immediately shadow the slice method. This way, when the slice methods get stabilized, calling them on an array will not be automatic through coercion, so we won't have trouble stabilizing the array methods later (cf. into_iter debacle). An unchecked version of `[T]::split_array` could also be added as in rust-lang#76014. This would not be needed for `[T; N]::split_array` as that can be compile-time checked. Edit: actually, since split_at_unchecked is internal-only it could be changed to be split_array-only.
…aahc Stabilise unix_process_wait_more, extra ExitStatusExt methods This stabilises the feature `unix_process_wait_more`. Tracking issue rust-lang#80695, FCP needed. This was implemented in rust-lang#79982 and merged in January.
Added next_up and next_down for f32/f64. This is a pull request implementing the features described at rust-lang/rfcs#3173.
…ackh726 add feature flag for `type_changing_struct_update` This implements the PR0 part of the mentoring notes within rust-lang#86618. overrides the previous inactive rust-lang#86646 pr. r? ``@nikomatsakis``
…l, r=davidtwco Implement -Z location-detail flag This PR implements the `-Z location-detail` flag as described in rust-lang/rfcs#2091 . `-Z location-detail=val` controls what location details are tracked when using `caller_location`. This allows users to control what location details are printed as part of panic messages, by allowing them to exclude any combination of filenames, line numbers, and column numbers. This option is intended to provide users with a way to mitigate the size impact of `#[track_caller]`. Some measurements of the savings of this approach on an embedded binary can be found here: rust-lang#70579 (comment) . Closes rust-lang#70580 (unless people want to leave that open as a place for discussion of further improvements). This is my first real PR to rust, so any help correcting mistakes / understanding side effects / improving my tests is appreciated :) I have one question: RFC 2091 specified this as a debugging option (I think that is what -Z implies?). Does that mean this can never be stabilized without a separate MCP? If so, do I need to submit an MCP now, or is the initial RFC specifying this option sufficient for this to be merged as is, and then an MCP would be needed for eventual stabilization?
…r=Mark-Simulacrum Add edition configuration to compiletest This allows the compiletest configuration to set a default edition that can still be overridden with header annotations. Doing this will make it far easier for clippy to get our tests to the newest edition. r? ``@Manishearth``
…calebcartwright Sync rustfmt subtree There's a large number of small fixes and new features, but nothing too big. Detailed changelog for those interested can be found in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#1438-2021-10-20
Make RSplit<T, P>: Clone not require T: Clone This addresses a TODO comment. The behavior of `#[derive(Clone)]` *does* result in a `T: Clone` requirement. Playground example: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=a8b1a9581ff8893baf401d624a53d35b Add a manual `Clone` implementation, mirroring `Split` and `SplitInclusive`. `(R)?SplitN(Mut)?` don't have any `Clone` implementations, but I'll leave that for its own pull request.
Add comment documenting why we can't use a simpler solution See rust-lang#90144 for context. r? ``@joshtriplett``
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
📌 Commit 0375880 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Oct 22, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 0375880 with merge f9e86b819c8af939974a4dc6da0824184523f3b9... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Oct 23, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
type_changing_struct_update
#89730 (add feature flag fortype_changing_struct_update
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup