Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't rebuild GUI test crates every time you run test src/test/rustdoc-gui #89520

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2021

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

This method has multiple advantages:

  • It'll completely remove the rustdoc-GUI test doc folder if rustdoc was updated
  • It'll rebuild GUI test crates only they have been updated

All in all, it's quite convenient! (even more with #88816)

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 4, 2021
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 4, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 9, 2021

📌 Commit d26e192 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 9, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2021
…st, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't rebuild GUI test crates every time you run test src/test/rustdoc-gui

This method has multiple advantages:

 * It'll completely remove the rustdoc-GUI test doc folder if rustdoc was updated
 * It'll rebuild GUI test crates only they have been updated

All in all, it's quite convenient! (even more with rust-lang#88816)

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2021
…st, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't rebuild GUI test crates every time you run test src/test/rustdoc-gui

This method has multiple advantages:

 * It'll completely remove the rustdoc-GUI test doc folder if rustdoc was updated
 * It'll rebuild GUI test crates only they have been updated

All in all, it's quite convenient! (even more with rust-lang#88816)

r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#88374 (Fix documentation in Cell)
 - rust-lang#88713 (Improve docs for int_log)
 - rust-lang#89428 (Feature gate the non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns lint)
 - rust-lang#89438 (docs: `std::hash::Hash` should ensure prefix-free data)
 - rust-lang#89520 (Don't rebuild GUI test crates every time you run test src/test/rustdoc-gui)
 - rust-lang#89705 (Cfg hide no_global_oom_handling and no_fp_fmt_parse)
 - rust-lang#89713 (Fix ABNF of inline asm options)
 - rust-lang#89718 (Add #[must_use] to is_condition tests)
 - rust-lang#89719 (Add #[must_use] to char escape methods)
 - rust-lang#89720 (Add #[must_use] to math and bit manipulation methods)
 - rust-lang#89735 (Stabilize proc_macro::is_available)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f1d0ce7 into rust-lang:master Oct 10, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Oct 10, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the cache-rustdoc-gui-test branch October 11, 2021 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants